| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:688-692. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.209429 © 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
The cardiovascular hybrid room a key component for hybrid interventions and image guided surgery in the emerging specialty of cardiovascular hybrid surgeryHoag Heart and Vascular Institute, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, One Hoag Drive, P.O. Box 6100, Newport Beach, CA 92658-6100, USA Received 10 April 2009; received in revised form 29 May 2009; accepted 3 June 2009
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 949-764-4573; fax: +1 949-650-1274.
The last few years has seen a paradigm shift in the treatment of cardiovascular related diseases from once traditional open surgical modalities to the entire cardiovascular tree being amenable to percutaneous interventions. The tremendous advances in transcatheter endovascular procedures currently being applied to the heart and the peripheral vasculature have resulted in a treatment paradigm shift in the care of the cardiovascular patient. These changing winds in the treatment of cardiovascular disease require that a new type of cardiovascular specialist, code-named the cardiovascular hybrid surgeon, be trained to perform and provide seamless care in providing both endovascular as well as open surgical procedures to this increasingly complex group of patients.
Key Words: Hybrid surgical suite; Cardiovascular hybrid surgery
Patient and market forces continue to push for minimally invasive approaches over more traditional open surgical approaches with proven efficacy and long-term treatment benefit. The cardiovascular surgeon of today must be required to adapt to this new technology driven trend [1]. These minimal invasive procedures or hybrid procedures have resulted in markedly decreased morbidity and mortality of elderly patients who would otherwise be exposed to major operative morbidity and mortality. Currently, large areas of traditional cardiac surgery as it stands are rapidly disappearing and have been substituted with less invasive percutaneous techniques. Areas of cardiovascular surgery in which transcatheter techniques are firmly established and are rapidly being adapted to treat the whole spectrum of the cardiovascular tree include treatment of coronary artery disease, in which coronary revascularization is increasingly being replaced by percutaneous interventions and possibly by the emerging techniques of angiogenesis and related advances in molecular genetics. Thoracic aortic aneurysms are rapidly disappearing from the surgical repertoire and are being treated with endovascular procedures. Here, a true benefit is already being observed when applying this minimally invasive, percutaneous approach in aged, polymorbid patients. Percutaneous techniques are currently used to treat atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus, and coarctation of the aorta. In the developing world, mitral and pulmonary stenosis is not being seen by surgeons: arrhythmia surgery (Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome, ventricular ablation, and atrial flutter) is an established domain of electro physiologically trained interventionists who have also completely taken over the pacemaker and defibrillator implantations, previously the work of cardiac surgeons. Aortic valve stenosis is currently being treated by transfemoral and transapical valve replacement, avoiding the inherent morbidity of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic manipulation, and prolonged intensive care unit stay with, in some cases, patients leaving the hospital the next day. The ability to provide such cutting edge technology borders on the availability of a new operative environment known as the hybrid surgical suite (Fig. 1).
A fully integrated interventional suite combines surgical sterility [2–4] with flat-panel cardiovascular imaging, a linked workstation, post processing, and storage facilities [5–7]. The size of the hybrid room should be of sufficient dimensions to allow anesthesiology facilities needed for full patient monitoring. Furthermore, any type of supportive equipment available in the room, such as machinery required for intravascular ultrasound, 3D transesophageal echocardiogram, rotational angiography as well as the ability for open conversion or hybrid intervention and endovascular supplies and devices must be able to fit in the hybrid suite. Current peripheral suites are fitted with many interesting features to make certain procedures easier. An on-table duplex ultrasound makes puncturing easy and is a good guide during endovenous laser therapy. The possibility of storing several reference points, to which the C-arm can be automatically relocated at any time during the procedure, facilitates the management of even extremely complex procedures. It is obvious that routine endovascular and open surgical practice both clearly gain from performance in this dual-capability working environment. For example, classic open bypass creation is immediately controlled on-table. When improvement of inflow or outflow becomes necessary after bypass surgery, balloon dilation with or without additional stent placement can be rapidly performed without dramatically prolonging procedural time. The use of an integrated endovascular suite, however, stretches beyond hybrid procedures and opens doors to new diagnostic and treatment possibilities. Three-dimensional reconstructions generated by integrated CT or rotational angiography can make a real-time visualization of vessel morphology in any direction and improve the visibility of vessel structures. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction during treatment of intracranial aneurysms, for instance, is a must to ensure optimal positioning of catheters, coils, balloons, and stents. An integrated setting means saving time and personnel because more procedures can be completed in the same room by the existing staff without increasing the strain on the team and without relocating equipment or personnel from another department. The hybrid suite should become the one stop shop where patients can get diagnosed and treated in one visit, for less downtime and a speedier recovery. Unique technology in the suite allows doctors across different specialties to work together on a case-by-case scenario, in the best interest of each patient. The most advanced imaging systems available provide quick and detailed information for shorter, more accurate treatment with substantially less X-ray exposure when compared to traditional devices. Complex cases are more easily treated, since the suite is designed to handle both minimally invasive percutaneous, hybrid operations and open surgical procedures. 2.1. Basic equipment and design of the hybrid endovascular operating room The primary components of the hybrid suite center on intraoperative angiography and fluoroscopy as well as carefully designed operating tables to accommodate and optimize the usefulness of the radiographic equipment. The hybrid suite imaging system provides superior image quality, higher tube heat capacity and has measurement capabilities capable of simple and complex procedures requiring high resolution. Price range is between US$1.2–2.0 million depending on the brand, specifications, ability to provide rotational angiography, and the cost could even be higher with the addition of a biplanar system and with integration of various sophisticated imaging modalities like 3D echocardiography, intracardiac ultrasound, intravascular ultrasound and electromagnetic navigation systems.
2.1.1. Size of the hybrid operating room and radiation
As endovascular/cardiovascular hybrid surgical procedures become more complex, the relationship of the C-arm, table and patient's position becomes even more important. The fluoroscopic unit should be able to move in a horizontal plane from the groin along the course of the vessel with the ability to ‘snap images on the move’. This parallel movement prevents the need for excessive contrast material and greatly expedites the procedure. When a catheter is placed in the brachial artery, the fluoroscopic unit must be capable of rapid movement over the catheter's path from the arm and through the thoracic aorta to the area of ultimate instrumentation. Obstructions from a table or a floor-mounted portable unit that hinder rapid panning over wide anatomic areas limit potential success of the procedure.
2.1.2. Carbon fiber table
2.1.3. Flat screens and monitors The surgeons, the assistant, the anesthesiologist and the nurse, should all have views of all major imaging and monitoring sources. It is therefore suggested that display of all these sources should be available in all four quadrants of an integrated room. A total of 4–6 ceiling-mounted flat screens as imaging tools for the procedures are necessary. Extreme care should be taken to ensure that these ceiling-mounted flat screens do not collide with operating lights. Monitors for the vital signs of the patient with provision for systemic arterial monitoring, central venous monitoring, and continuous electrocardiographic surveillance is imperative. A large 40-inch flat panel should be available as well as cameras (wall/or in-light).
2.1.4. Patient monitoring
The imaging quality is dominated by the quality of the fluoroscopy unit available. Available systems can be divided roughly into two categories: portable and fixed C-arm units. Fixed C-arm units could be floor mounted (Fig. 4) or ceiling mounted. There are a number of fixed fluoroscopic units available with various modifications, depending on the manufacturer (e.g. Philips, GE, OEC, Siemens, Toshiba). The image quality of fixed systems is usually superior to portable systems which can be explained by the focal spot sizes of fixed systems being significantly smaller than those of portable units [9, 10]. A smaller focal spot size means higher resolution through more line pairs per millimeter. Nevertheless, the latest portable C-arm systems (Fig. 5) are able to reach resolutions up to 2.5e3 line pairs per mm, values which only could be attained by fixed systems until recently. The monitor resolution of fixed systems differs from portable systems, with the monitors of fixed systems usually having twice the lines of resolution as the monitors of portable systems. Portable systems have a smaller generator in order to keep the system ‘practical’ whilst fixed systems have a large remote generator which provides more power, with better tissue penetration and improved imaging quality. Currently, portable C-arm systems are able to provide sufficient quality for the majority of the standard procedures in cardiovascular surgery. However, the more complex procedures are best performed with a fixed unit.
3.1. Image acquisition and display Traditional fluoroscopy provides real-time, high-resolution, low-contrast images in two dimensions through the use of an image intensifier. The development of a flat-panel detector to replace the image intensifier has enabled fluoroscopy to transition into three dimensions, producing a CT-like image (Fig. 6). The contrast resolution of CT is  1 Hounsfield unit (HU), whereas the contrast resolution of a CT-like image is around 10 HU. CT fluoroscopy is not meant to replace diagnostic CT but to be used as a tool that will supplement interventional procedures. The ability to acquire data in three dimensions during an intervention has led to the fusion of three-dimensional datasets with the two-dimensional images displayed on typical monitors. In CT rotational angiography, which the latest hybrid imaging systems have, the C-arm is used to rapidly rotate, obtaining serial images of the area in question in a radial fashion. The three-dimensional reconstruction can be registered with subsequent real-time fluoroscopic images and projected to offer the clinician the ability to work in three dimensions. The process by which the image is registered and displayed is the subject of considerable research efforts on the part of many imaging equipment manufacturers. Data can be rendered volumetrically and overlayed on the fluoroscopic image, making the anatomy much more identifiable, a fused two-dimensional/three-dimensional dataset can be created, or the information can be placed side by side. Further requirements of the suite's imaging system are a processing unit, a workstation, and a central image storage unit. The potential of any C-arm equals the weakest link of each of these last three elements. While performing a procedure, smooth and fast graphic abilities are a must. Using large-size, superb-quality images from a C-arm implies that a powerful processing unit is needed. The higher the image quality, the more working memory the processing unit needs. Images from a C-arm are stored in DICOM format files, which can then be used for biometric post-processing, such as quantitative vessel analysis or three-dimensional reconstruction. The higher the quality of the images obtained from the C-arm, the larger the size of the files that have to be processed by the workstation. Advanced imaging using Dynamic 3D Roadmap has significant clinical advantages for applications such as real-time catheter navigation and monitoring coil delivery. The image is dynamic, meaning the 3D roadmap remains displayed even if the C-arc projection, source-to-image distance and field of view size are changed (Fig. 7). The 3D volume automatically follows the orientation of the C-arc in real-time, so that users can choose the optimal projection view. This dynamic overlay ensures excellent positioning for catheter navigation during challenging interventions. The dynamic 3D image decreases the number of DSA acquisitions and fluoroscopy time for an examination. The user can also recall roadmap positions to reduce the need to re-mask. This reduces X-ray dose and contrast medium, which can reduce procedure costs. Dynamic 3D Roadmap provides live interventional catheter navigation.
3.2. Other imaging modalities Intergration of other imaging modalities like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) (Fig. 8) permits more data acquisition [11]. The explosion of the endovascular revolution with particular application to the aorta has placed new demands on accurate preoperative and intraoperative imaging to obtain accurate aortic measurements for endovascular stent-grafting of the aorta [12, 13]. IVUS technology requires that the user be adequately versed in the process of performing the acquisition and interpretation of the images. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, transesophageal echocardiography and epiaortic ultrasound have been used to characterize the severity of atherosclerosis within the ascending aorta [14]. Such information has been used to modify surgical technique, altering the location of cannula insertion, the position of aortic cross-clamps, and the placement of saphenous vein grafts, and reduce the risk of dislodging atheromatous debris.
3.3. Future perspectives Wireless devices will become reality in the near future and will overcome the direct limitations now present due to wire connection points. In a wireless setting, the operating table, C-arm, and other equipment can be rotated a full 360° (and beyond) at any location within the surgical/endovascular suite. Wireless equipment would also save time in case one piece of equipment needs to be repaired. A broken piece of equipment can be temporarily removed from the interventional suite and replaced by a spare. The cardiovascular surgeon or interventionist would not lose valuable operation time, and patients would not need to be put on hold. The technical team would not have to wait for spare parts or specialized tools for a certain repair because the broken piece could easily be shipped to a central repair point. Moreover, this approach would save time and costs related to the mobility of a highly specialized technical team. Integration of robotic and navigational techniques into clinical practice may lead to improved catheter accuracy, stability, and safety in comparison with conventional techniques, while minimizing radiation exposure. By maximizing the use of existing technologies while developing new approaches to treating these challenging cases, we hope that these would lead to improve overall clinical outcomes and further reduce the mortality and morbidity rates associated with managing the cardiovascular patient. It is hoped that as these new fields develop and with increasing experience with these new hybrid methods, we may well be able to maximize the applicability of minimally invasive endovascular and hybrid technology to treat a larger cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |
Top
Abstract
1. Introduction
