ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:545-546. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.203067
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ulrich F.W. Franke
Marc Albert
Christian Rustenbach
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franke, U. F.W.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franke, U. F.W.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, H.

Case report - Valves

Minimally invasive Ross procedure through partial upper sternotomy

Ulrich F.W. Franke*, Marc Albert, Christian Rustenbach and Hardy Baumbach

Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, Robert Bosch Hospital, Auerbachstr. 110, D-70376, Stuttgart, Germany

Received 26 January 2009; received in revised form 16 April 2009; accepted 20 April 2009

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-711-8101-3650; fax: +49-711-8101-3798.

E-mail address: ulrich.franke{at}rbk.de (U.F.W. Franke).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 References
 
The Ross procedure has gained increasing interest for therapy of aortic valve pathologies in young adults because of excellent long-term results. This case report describes the first published experiences of the Ross procedure performed through a minimally invasive access in two consecutive patients. The limited access is associated with only a slightly prolonged aortic cross-clamp time. Consequently, a minimal access method does not result in an increased risk for patients.

Key Words: Aortic valve replacement; Minimal invasive surgery; Surgical technique

For patients younger than 65 years old, mechanical prostheses are recommended [1]. However, these prostheses demonstrate an incidence of severe, valve-related, adverse events of 2–5% per year. The Ross procedure, characterized by the replacement of the diseased aortic valve with the pulmonary autograft, and the transplantation of a pulmonary homograft in the pulmonary valve position, has gained increasing interest for therapy of aortic valve pathologies in adults [2]. Postoperative anticoagulation is not required. Long-term results are excellent, with stable function of both the aortic and pulmonary valves, and a low incidence of valve-related complications [3–5].

Minimally invasive access to the aortic valve, through partial sternotomy, allows for better postoperative recovery of the patient, due to higher stability of the thorax and better conservation of the lung function [6, 7]. A superior cosmetic result compared to the complete sternotomy, has increasing importance, especially for young patients. However, no reports exist regarding the application of this access method to technically more complex procedures. Here, we report our initial experiences of the Ross procedure, through a partial upper sternotomy, in the first two consecutive patients.

A 30-year-old male patient had suffered from chronic ulcerous colitis since 1996. The preoperative diagnostics confirmed a bicuspid valve with leading insufficiency. The left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced slightly to 57%. The second patient, a 51-year-old female, was deeply interested in an optimal cosmetic result. The body mass index of the patients measured 23 and 25, respectively.

For the procedure, we used our standard access for minimally invasive aortic valve surgery. Through a 6 cm skin incision, starting at the sternal angulus (Fig. 1), the partial upper L-shape sternotomy was performed using an oscillating saw. The sternum was opened at the midline, down to the fourth right intercostal space, sparing the right internal mammarian artery. A flat two-stage venous canula (Medtronic®, Düsseldorf, Germany) was inserted through a separate subxyphoideal skin incision, pulled up retrosternally and pre-pericardially, and putted in place through the right auriculum. Aortic canula was placed into the distal ascending aorta and led out through the main access as well as the aortic cross-clamp. The Ross procedure was executed using the root replacement technique. Compared to our standard procedure, the pulmonary homograft was implanted after implantation of the autograft in the aortic annulus. At this time, the homograft was placed through the aortic annulus into the left ventricular outflow tract. The knotted suture next to the pulmonary valve can be used to move the right ventricular outflow tract onto the left side, if necessary. For autograft implantation, interrupted sutures were applied encircling a continuous Teflon strip to ensure prophylaxis of subsequent annular dilation. All other anastomoses were performed using continuous sutures (Fig. 2). Aortic cross-clamp times were 153 min and 142 min, and the total bypass times were 183 min and 170 min, respectively. For myocardial protection, Brettschneider's HTK-solution (Custodiol®, Köhler–Chemie, Ansbach, Germany) was initially administered at 2000 ml via aortic root, and later at 1000 ml through coronary ostia, after 90 min of cardiac arrest. Pulmonary homografts were supplied by the German Society for Tissue Transplantation (DGfG, Hannover, Germany).


Figure 1
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Optimal cosmetic result at the 5th postoperative day.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Operative situs. Aortic clamp and vent-catheter are visible at the left edge of the picture.

 
Postoperatively, patients were ventilated for 5 h. Time spent in the intensive care unit was 1 day. Admission was recorded on postoperative days 8 and 5, respectively. In both patients, there was no echocardiographic evidence for regurgitation at either the aortic or pulmonary valves, correspondingly. The mean gradients confirmed at the aortic valve were 3 and 6 mmHg respectively. There was no gradient at the pulmonary valve in both patients. The overall cosmetic result was considered excellent (Fig. 1).

We conclude that the Ross procedure can be performed technically, through minimally invasive access, in patients with typical anatomy and body mass index. This limited access is associated with only a slightly prolonged aortic cross-clamp time. In case of complications, the transformation to a complete sternotomy can be performed at every stage of procedure. Consequently, the minimal access method does not result in an increased risk to patients.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 References
 

  1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Circulation 2006;114:e84–e231.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967;2:956–958.[Medline]
  3. Hanke T, Stierle U, Boehm JO, Botha CA, Bechtel JFM, Erasmi A, Misfeld M, Hemmer W, Rein JG, Robinson DR, Lange R, Horer J, Moritz A, Ozaslan F, Wahlers T, Franke UFW, Hetzer R, Hubler M, Ziemer G, Graf B, Ross DN, Sievers HH. Autograft regurgitation and aortic root dimensions after the Ross procedure: the German Ross Registry experience. Circulation 2007;116(Suppl_11):I251–I258.[Medline]
  4. Kouchoukos NT, Masetti P, Nickerson NJ, Castner CF, Shannon WD, Davila-Roman VG. The Ross procedure: long-term clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:773–781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ryan WH, Herbert MA, Dewey TM, Agarwal S, Ryan AL, Prince SL, Mack MJ. The occurrence of postoperative pulmonary homograft stenosis in adult patients undergoing the Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 2006;15:108–113.[Medline]
  6. Tabata M, Umakanthan R, Cohn LH, Bolman RM III, Shekar PS, Chen FY, Couper GS, Aranki SF. Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:537–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, Jeanmart H, De Geest R, Degrieck I, Van Praet F, Vermeulen Y, Vanermen H. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599–1604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ulrich F.W. Franke
Marc Albert
Christian Rustenbach
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Franke, U. F.W.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Franke, U. F.W.
Right arrow Articles by Baumbach, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS