|
|
||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:87-88. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.195180A © 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
eComment: Discrete subaortic stenosis following repair of atrioventricular septal defectsNational Cardiothoracic Centre, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, PO Box KB 846, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana Outcome after reoperation for atrioventricular septal defect repair We read with interest the report by Birim and colleagues [1]. Their experience highlights the issue of reoperations following the repair of atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD). The important contribution of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) to reoperations and second reoperations is obvious in their report. However, the authors did not comment on the characteristics of the LVOTO such as the pre- and postoperative gradients and their threshold for intervention. It may be deduced from their operative technique that they were dealing with discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) as the cause of LVOTO. DSS is thought to be an acquired lesion secondary to pre-existing anatomic alterations in the left ventricular vestibule [2]. It has been reported after the surgical repair of several congenital heart defects such as coarctation of the aorta and AVSD among others [3]. Morphological substrates that cause turbulence and increased shear stress in the subaortic region are thought to contribute to its development through stimulation of the endothelium. Most patients with significant DSS are asymptomatic, underscoring the importance of regular follow-up. DSS is a well-defined membranous or fibromembranous ring that partially or completely encircles the subvalvular aortic region. It has the tendency to be progressive with worsening gradients and the appearance or deterioration of aortic incompetence (AI). The necessity for surgical intervention is usually not in doubt. The timing and technique of surgery are, however, without consensus. The indication for surgery has been the relief of LVOTO and the prevention or deterioration of AI. Enucleation with or without septal myectomy provides relief of LVOTO. Although early surgical intervention relieves the obstruction, recurrence still remains a long-term complication as demonstrated [1]. The time of recurrence appears to be inversely related to the extent of subvalvular resection. For those patients undergoing primary operations for discrete subaortic stenosis, adding a myectomy to enucleation does not guarantee superior results in terms of the relief of LVOTO [4]. However, for patients who have had a previous cardiac operation, concomitant myectomy gives a significantly lower-rate of recurrence of LVOTO (44% for enucleation against 13% for enucleation plus myectomy) [4]. Surgery unfortunately may not have a beneficial impact on AI, both in terms of incidence and severity [5].
Related Article
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |