ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;8:522. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.192757B
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Leo A. Bockeria
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bockeria, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bockeria, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

eComment

eComment: Re: Is repeated administration of blood-cardioplegia really necessary?

Leo A. Bockeria

Bakoulev Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, 121552 Moscow, Russia

Is repeated administration of blood-cardioplegia really necessary?

The problem of intraoperative myocardial protection using intermittent warm blood cardioplegia still gives rise to more questions than answers. There are no standard adopted protocol for cardioplegia administration, no protocol confirming the safety of various time periods between reinfusion runs, and no data on myocardium metabolism during warm cardioplegic ischemia. This work demonstrates the possibility to prolong singleshot cardioplegic ischemia up to 40 min [1]. The results confirm data previously obtained by several authors. However, we still have no substantiated protocol and no clear determination of the duration of safe normothermic cardioplegic ischemia. We are not aware of the process of myocardial metabolism disturbances which can be reversible, but probably can affect unfavourably the postoperative course. Prompt performance of surgical intervention cannot be judged as an index of satisfactory intraoperative myocardial protection, especially if the period of cardioplegic ischemia does not exceed 60 min. The conclusions presented in the article seem logical, but they need to be backed up by an in-depth study of the state of myocardium using different markers of this injury.


    Reference
 Top
 Reference
 

  1. Ghazy T, Allham O, Ouda A, Kappert U, Matschke K. Is repeated administration of blood-cardioplegia really necessary? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;8:517–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Is repeated administration of blood-cardioplegia really necessary?
Tamer Ghazy, Omar Allham, Ahmed Ouda, Utz Kappert, and Klaus Matschke
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009 8: 517-521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Leo A. Bockeria
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bockeria, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bockeria, L. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS