|
|
||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;8:402-407. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.192831 © 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Development of novel drug-eluting biodegradable nano-fiber for prevention of postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Pulmonary venous obstruction; Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection; Tacrolimus; Nano-fiber; Intimal hyperplasia
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used an electrospinning method to develop a nano-scaled cotton-wool configuration fiber to continuously release an anti-scarring agent to prevent anastomotic stricture. This fiber is composed of biodegradable polymer and tacrolimus, called Tacrolimus-eluting biodegradable nano-fiber (TEBN), to achieve the sustained release of tacrolimus. We previously reported that TEBN inhibited neointimal hyperplasia of the arterial anastomotic stricture in a rat model [7]. The technology behind TEBN is based on the preventive effect against neointimal overgrowth by sustained release of an anti-scarring agent. The mechanism of sustained release is achieved by continuous and gradual degradation of biodegradable polymer due to hydrolysis over time. Tacrolimus has been evaluated in many previous studies as a preventative drug for neointimal hyperplasia in terms of its release kinetics, effective dosage, safety in clinical practice, and benefit [8, 9]. TEBN is characterized by its cotton-wool-like texture, which can flexibly fit any type of anastomosis. Therefore, this new product will be welcomed in pediatric cardiac surgery departments, which have limited storage space.
We hypothesized that TEBN may be applied to prevent stricture of pulmonary venous anastomosis. In the present study, we established a model of venous anastomotic stricture in a rat inferior venous cava (IVC) to evaluate whether TEBN can effectively prevent venous stricture. The structure of a pulmonary vein is histologicaly similar to that of the human inferior vena cava, because systemic vein and PV had a connection in the embryo [10]. Although there are differences of vascular healing between rat and humans, and structural difference between veno-venous and veno-atrial anastomosis, we applied our IVC anastomosis model as a PVO model at least partly. Our definitive goal is to develop a means to prevent PVO in humans.
| 2. Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.2. Fabrication of tacrolimus-eluting biodegradable nano-fiber and kinetics
We focused on tacrolimus as an anti-stricture agent. Methods of TEBN fabrication were described previously [7]. In brief, tacrolimus (Fermentel Ltd, Israel) was mixed with biodegradable polymer. We prepared poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA, PLLA:PGA=50:50) for biodegradable polymer. To fabricate nano-scale fiber, we applied an electrospinning procedure. The shape of TEBN looks like a cotton wool formation (Fig. 1a). The diameter of the nanofiber ranged from 100 to 800 nm (Fig. 1b,c). It is easy to handle for any type of vascular anastomosis in virtue of its flexible property and characteristic configuration. The maximum tacrolimus content in the TEBN was 1 wt%. In vitro and in vivo release tests revealed that tacrolimus was released from TEBN gradually (Fig. 2). The cell growth curves for inhibition test in cell proliferation showed that TEBN significantly inhibited proliferation of human aortic smooth muscle cell (HASMC) (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, 5 mg TEBN-placed rats survived for at least more than eight weeks, and no marrow suppression, renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction or pancreatic dysfunction were observed. In addition, the tacrolimus did not flow out in blood.
|
|
|
|
2.4. Histological analysis and ratio of intima/vessel wall (Intima+Media) area
For the histological analysis, the anastomotic sites were resected beyond the suture lines, fixed with 7.5% buffered formaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich Japan, Tokyo, Japan), and embedded in paraffin. Short axial consecutive 5 µm serial sections were obtained just around the suture anastomosis. Three individual and random sections from the anastomosis site were evaluated. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for morphometric analysis. The area of the intima (including neointima) and media at the anastomosis site was measured on the sections stained with HE. To achieve a reproducible result, the mean value of this area (intima and media) from three sections was adopted. To characterize neointimal hyperplasia, the ratio of intimal area was calculated with the following formula: Ratio of Intimal Area=Intimal Area/(Intimal+Median Area)This morphometric analysis was performed by a specialized technician using Image J for Mac OS X (Wane Rasband, NIH) with masking.
2.5. Immunohistochemical analysis for neointimal hyperplasia and endothelial cells
Immunohistochemical staining was performed to identify the cells which composed the intimal hyperplasia, and to evaluate re-endothelialization at the injured anastomotic site.
-Smooth muscle actin antibody (1:3000) (ASMA; Sigma), SMemb (1:3000) (Sigma) and factor VIII antibody (ready-to-use) (NeoMarker, CA) were used as primary antibodies. Biotinylated secondary antibody (1:400) (anti-mouse IgG; Vector Laboratories, CA) was applied, and avidin–biotin complex Vecstain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) was used for visualization. Finally, slides were developed in diaminobenzidine solution and counterstained with hematoxylin.
Statistical analysis was performed using software Statview for Mac (Version 5.0, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). These data were analyzed by unpaired t-test for comparison between both groups in each time point of Ratio of Intimal Area. And one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc multiple comparisons of Scheffe procedure was performed for time course change in both groups. Experimental results were expressed as mean±S.D. A difference with a P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. | 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.1. Ratios of neointimal-hyperplasia and histological findings
The ratio of intimal area in the control without TEBN and with 5 mg of TEBN (tacrolimus containing 1.0 wt%) were 0.43±0.26 and 0.07±0.04 at 1 week, 0.39±0.19 and 0.05±0.05 at 2 weeks, and 0.31±0.15 and 0.09±0.04 at 4 weeks, respectively (Fig. 5). TEBN inhibited neointimal hyperplasia significantly at each time point (1, 2 and 4 weeks).
|
|
|
| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recurrent PVO can be localized at the site of the PV anastomosis or endocardial thickening of the PV ostia frequently resulting in diffuse PV sclerosis. The cause of PVO could be that the abnormal architecture of the pulmonary vasculature typically observed in patients with TAPVC could render these vessels more vulnerable to developing intimal hyperplasia, and ultimately obstruction, in response to distal anastomotic stenosis [11, 12]. After all, focal injury from the suture line, suture material, or handling of the vein tissue can also serve as a focal point of acute injury [5].
In the present study, we proposed a novel strategy to prevent PVO using an anti-scarring drug which was processed into controlled release. The drug selected for use is a major issue. Steroid is a major medicine for internal (oral or intravenous) systemic administration to prevent PVO conventionally. However, discontinuation of steroid can require re-operation and steroid therapy can induce serious side effects such as adrenal insufficiency or infection [3, 13]. On the other hand, our device may be able to reduce side effects, because our strategy is local administration of a drug. Sirolimus and paclitaxel are famous drugs for drug eluting stent (DES) in the field of coronary disease. These drugs are also a candidate for anti-scarring agent. However, we did not choose these drugs for our material, because paclitaxel is an anti-cancer drug (not appropriate for neonates), and sirolimus has a possibility of late thrombosis which is reported after DES treatment.
Our results of the previous report revealed that 5 mg of 1.0 wt% of TEBN in which tacrolimus amounted to 50 µg, prevented neointimal hyperplasia but did not affect reendothelialization after arterial anastomotic stricture [7]. There was no blood concentration of tacrolimus and no remarkable side effects in our rat models weighing from 300 to 350 g that was smaller than neonates. Thus, tacrolimus with its potent anti-inflammatory and less prothromobotic effects may be a promising compound for use in drug-eluting material or clinically applicable mode of treatment even in a field of neonates and pediatric cardiac surgery.
In conclusion, we have developed a novel sustained drug delivery device called TEBN. And we proposed novel strategy for preventing PVO after TAPVC repair. This cotton-wool shaped TEBN reduced neointimal hyperplasia and preserved endothelialization in a rat venous anastomotic model, suggesting that it will be a very promising material for vascular anastomotic stricture to prevent PVO.
This study was based on the rat veno-venous anastomosis model. The vascular healing process of the rat may be quite different from that of other animals including human. And there is a structural difference between veno-venous anastomosis and veno-atrial anastomosis. Further study is necessary to investigate whether the same effect is observed in a large animal model and veno-atrial anastomosis model.There is study limitation in the measurement method of intimal area. We tried to make the sections carefully to avoid oblique, however, it could not be denied completely by our procedure. However, we believe that over and under estimation of the intimal area are offset by adopting three points of average.
| Conference discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors of this study devised a very interesting experimental protocol to study the possibility of preventing the pulmonary venous obstruction following surgery for total anomalous pulmonary venous connection. And they used a tacrolimus-eluting biodegradable nano-fiber — a very clever idea, I have to say — implanted in this experimental model of surgical stenosis in inferior vena cava in rats. The aim of the treatment was to avoid or prevent obstruction considering the neointimal hyperplasia as the main mechanism.
The histological results provided are quite encouraging. Furthermore, and first of all, the authors demonstrate the feasibility of their technique. The question remaining open mainly relates to the safety of the approach before any potential move into the clinical use in patients.
My questions are related to three main topics. First is the choice of the model. The authors used a rat as a model creating a surgical stenosis in inferior vena cava. The rat model is well known to have a very low complication rate in terms of thrombosis, compared to experimental models of other species of large size, particularly pigs and so forth. In addition to that, the authors didn't use any antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment in the period of this study. Therefore, the first question is: are you considering now to move this same type of protocol to large-size animals with thrombogenesis more similar to the one of human beings, like pigs, or are you considering the potential increased risk of thrombosis when you move to another model?
Second topic is the size of the stent in correspondence of the created stenosis of the inferior vena cava. In the paper and in your presentation I didn't find any information regarding the size of the inferior vena cava after creating the obstruction. Could you please give us this type of information, because it's very important as a potential correlation with the size of the obstructed pulmonary veins in infants?
And final question is the species-to-species relationship. Do you have any information about the neointima formation and the relationship with the biodegradable stent when you move to another species, or do you have any correlation between rat model and human beings in terms of development of neointima?
Anyway, the authors are to be encouraged to continue their experimental studies in order to find all the answers before moving with this technique to the potential clinical application.
Dr. Mutsuga: With regard to your first question, I didn't show the thrombosis rate in this series. In the one-week series, there is significant difference between the control group and the TEBN group. Control group is 75% thrombosis rate and TEBN group was 25%. However, 2 weeks and 4 weeks, we have only 25% in both groups.
And the size of this material is about 5 mm, but this shape resembles a cotton-wool appearance. We can change the shape, divide 2 piece and 3 pieces, and it is easy to fit any types of surgical anastomosis which is real along the PV in neonates.
And with regard to your third question, the vascular healing process of the rat may be quite different from that of other animals, including human, and it is also different from venoatrial anastomosis. Further study is necessary to investigate whether the same effect is observed in a large animal model or venoatrial anastomosis model.
Dr. S. Sano (Okayama, Japan): I have a couple of questions to you.
First question is that is your drug-eluting stent with sirolimus different from usual stent used in coronary artery disease?
The second question is that the most difficult patient with recurrent PVO occurs distal to the suture line. Does your material prevent the neointimal proliferation along this stent or just inside the stent?
Dr. Mutsuga: The famous drug for using drug-eluting stent is sirolimus and paclitaxel. Paclitaxel is an anticancer drug. And we did not choose for our material because we think this material for neonates. And sirolimus is a famous drug also, but sirolimus effect is strong. The tacrolimus is 100 times less potential than sirolimus.
Dr. Sano: Did you compare the two? Did you compare the intimal proliferation between two?
Dr. Mutsuga: No, we have no data.
And with regard to the second question, we think and we believe this material is usual for the distal side of neointimal hyperplasia point.
Dr. V. Hraska (Sankt Augustin, Germany): I have just a comment. I wish it works, of course.
But I think it's a big difference between the native pulmonary venous stenosis and the secondary pulmonary venous stenosis. Recently we had a patient with a native pulmonary venous stenosis involving all veins. He was successfully operated on, sent home without obstruction. Now he is coming back on a regular basis because of recurrent obstruction. In this patient we have used drug-eluted stents with no effect.
So probably the mechanism is completely different between these two lesions. On the top of that usually surgery is successful in the secondary pulmonary venous stenosis. Nevertheless it sounds promising that something might be available on the market in the future.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |