ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:986-989. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.182279
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hans-Beat Ris
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melloul, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ris, H.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melloul, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ris, H.-B.

Institutional report - Thoracic general

Mortality, complications and loss of pulmonary function after pneumonectomy vs. sleeve lobectomy in patients younger and older than 70 years

Emanuel Melloula, Bernhard Eggerb, Thorsten Kruegera, Cai Chenga, Francois Mithieuxa, Christiane Ruffieuxc, Lennart Magnussond and Hans-Beat Risa,*

a Division of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
b Division of Pneumology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
c Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
d Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 22 April 2008; received in revised form 12 June 2008; accepted 17 June 2008

Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 21 314 24 08; fax: +41 21 314 23 58.

E-mail address: hans-beat.ris{at}chuv.ch (H.-B. Ris).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
Retrospective single institution analysis of all patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 2000 and 2005. Seventy-eight patients underwent pneumonectomy (65 patients <70 years, 13 patients >70 years) and 69 sleeve lobectomy (50 patients <70  years, 19 patients >70 years). Pre-existing co-morbidity, surgical indication and induction therapy was similarly distributed between treatment by age-groups. In patients <70 years, pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy resulted in a 30-day mortality of 3% vs. 0 and an overall complication rate of 26% vs. 44%, respectively. In patients >70 years, pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy resulted in a 30-day mortality of 15% vs. 0 and an overall complication rate of 23% vs. 32%. In both age groups, pneumonectomy was associated with more airway complications (NS) and a significantly higher postoperative loss of FEV1 than sleeve lobectomy (P<0.0001, P<0.03). Age per se did not influence the loss of FEV1 and DLCO for a given type of resection. Sleeve lobectomy may have a therapeutic advantage over pneumonectomy in the postoperative course of elderly patients.

Key Words: Age; Pneumonectomy; Sleeve lobectomy; Pulmonary function; Morbidity; Mortality


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
A recently published meta-analysis has demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative morbidity, mortality, recurrence rate and survival after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in patients with NSCLC [1]. Since major resections are increasingly performed in elderly patients [2–5], sleeve resections may be particularly useful in this age group in order to decrease the risk of postoperative mortality and complications while preserving lung function and quality of life. However, there are actually no data available which specifically compare the postoperative risk and loss of pulmonary function of pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in different age populations.

In this retrospective single institution study of patients treated between 2000 and 2005, we assessed postoperative mortality, complications and loss of pulmonary function after pneumonectomy vs. sleeve resection in patients less than and in patients more than 70 years old.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
All patients qualifying for major pulmonary resection underwent preoperative pulmonary and cardiac evaluation according to the algorithm of Bolliger [6] and Miller [7], respectively. Patients with predicted FEV1 and DLCO of <80% underwent exercise testing and patients with VO2 max of <20 ml/kg/min had split function testing by ventilation/perfusion scan; resection was performed if a postoperative predicted VO2 max of ≥10 ml/kg/min was obtained. All patients >50 years and those with a history of heart disease underwent echocardiography and those with signs of ischemia myocardium scintigraphy or stress echocardiography. Resection was performed in the absence of signs of reversible ischaemia and preserved left ventricular function. Continuous peridural anaesthesia was offered to all patients in the absence of contraindications. Sleeve lobectomy was preferred to pneumonectomy whenever possible. If the extent of the disease required a pneumonectomy, resection was performed in the case of a postoperative predicted VO2 max of ≥10 ml/kg/min and normal echocardiography. All patients had muscle flap coverage of the bronchial stump or airway anastomosis. All patients underwent postoperative avoidance of fluid overload, prevention of atelectasis by early mobilisation and chest physiotherapy, and routine s.c. thrombo-prophylaxis. Patients with pneumonectomy had postoperative oral anticoagulation for three months.

2.1. Follow-up

The charts of all patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2005 were revisited. Pre-existing co-morbidities, indications for surgery, induction therapy and side of pneumonectomy were noted for each patient as well as 30-day mortality and major postoperative morbidity including pneumonia, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pulmonary embolism, cerebro-vascular accidents, airway dehiscence, broncho-pleural fistula, empyema or infections of the thoracotomy site. Minor complications were excluded such as atelectasis requiring <2 bronchoscopies, non-infected pleural effusion, residual air space, infections at the site of chest tubes and arrhythmias responding to medical therapy [8]. Postoperative pulmonary function testing (FEV1, DLCO) performed between 3 and 6 months after the operation were recorded and were compared to preoperative values.

2.2. Statistical analysis

The {chi}2 and Fisher's exact-test were used to determine differences in proportions. The Wilcoxon test was used to test the differences in loss of FEV1 and DLCO. Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered significant.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
One hundred and forty-three patients underwent pneumonectomy or sleeve resection at our institution between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2005. Seventy-eight patients underwent pneumonectomy, 65 patients were younger and 13 patients older than 70 years at the time of operation. Sixty-nine patients underwent sleeve lobectomy, 50 patients were younger and 19 older than 70 years. NSCLC was the predominant indication for surgery accounting for 77% and 79% of patients requiring pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy, respectively. Pathological stage I, II and III NSCLC was found in 36%, 27% and 36% of patients requiring pneumonectomy, and 22%, 44% and 33% of patients requiring sleeve lobectomy (NS). Table 1 shows the distribution of pre-existing COPD, coronary artery disease, obesity and induction therapy for each of the four treatments by age-groups. There were no significant differences for these variables between the four groups. For patients undergoing pneumonectomy, a right-sided procedure was more frequently performed in patients <70 years (P=0.03). The preoperative predicted FEV1 and DLCO were 79.5±19.5% and 72.8±20.9% in patients <70 years, and 80.5±21.3% and 72±20.8% in patients >70 years, respectively, without significant difference between both age groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient characteristics according to the surgical procedure and the age at operation

 
3.1. Postoperative mortality and complications

Table 2 indicates the 30-day mortality and the complications after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in patients <70 years. Pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy resulted in a 30-day mortality of 3% vs. 0 (P=0.5) and an overall complication rate of 26% vs. 44% (P=0.05). Two patients died after pneumonectomy, one from myocardial infarction and one from broncho-pleural fistula associated with multiorgan failure. Pneumonectomy was associated with more cardiac complications (NS) and broncho-pleural fistulas (NS), and sleeve lobectomy with more pulmonary complications (P=0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Postoperative 30-day mortality and complication rate after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in patients <70 years of age

 
Table 3 shows the 30-day mortality and the complications after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in patients >70 years. Pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy resulted in a 30-day mortality rate of 15% vs. 0 (P=0.2) and an overall complication rate of 23% vs. 32% (P=0.7). Two patients died after pneumonectomy, one from pneumonia and one from broncho-pleural fistula and ARDS. Pulmonary and cardiac complications were more frequent after sleeve lobectomy than after pneumonectomy (NS) and the incidence of airway dehiscence (BPF) was higher after pneumonectomy than after sleeve lobectomy (NS).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Postoperative 30-day mortality and complication rate after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in patients >70 years of age

 
3.2. Postoperative loss of pulmonary function

Table 4 shows the differences in preoperative and postoperative predicted FEV1 and DLCO for each treatment group. There was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative FEV1 and DLCO values for both procedures in both age groups (P<0.05), except for FEV1 in patients >70 years undergoing sleeve lobectomy (NS). In patients <70 years, the postoperative loss of FEV1 and DLCO were significantly higher after pneumonectomy than after sleeve lobectomy (P<0.0001, P=0.008); in patients >70 years, the same holds true for FEV1 (P=0.03) but not for DLCO (NS). Patients <70 years undergoing pneumonectomy had a similar loss of FEV1 and DLCO as patients >70 years undergoing pneumonectomy (NS). The same holds true for sleeve lobectomy (NS).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Difference in preoperative and postoperative FEV1 and DLCO after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy according to the age of the patients at operation

 

    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 
It has been shown that life expectancy of persons aged 70 and 80 years in western countries is 14 years and 8.6 years, respectively, and that at least 75% and 50% of the rest of their lives are spent living independently [9, 10]. Elderly patients are therefore no longer excluded from NSCLC surgery solely on the base of short life expectancy or decreased quality of life.

Although there is no definition of an elderly patient, individuals who are 70 years or older have decreased cardiopulmonary reserves and are at an increased risk of developing postoperative complications after lung resection [2]. However, several studies confirm the feasibility and the survival benefit of major resections in properly selected patients older than 70 years, with a reported postoperative mortality rate ranging from 1% to 21% [2–5]. This wide range of postoperative mortality may be related to differences in patient selection, peri- and postoperative management and the rate of pneumonectomy which varied from 0–29%. A review of the literature and a recently published case-control study revealed a postoperative mortality rate of 16–20% [11] and 11% [12] after pneumonectomy in patients >70 years, respectively, indicating that pneumonectomy should be avoided in the elderly whenever possible.

Sleeve lobectomy has gained increasing acceptance as an alternative to pneumonectomy in patients requiring resection for NSCLC. A recently published meta-analysis in this respect revealed a pooled postoperative mortality and complication rate for sleeve resection and pneumonectomy of 3.5% vs. 5.7% and 31% vs. 32%, respectively, without significant difference [1]. However, the mean age of the studied population ranged from 59 to 65 years for sleeve lobectomy and from 58 to 67 years for pneumonectomy. There is actually no study available assessing the risk of sleeve resection and pneumonectomy in specific age populations.

In this retrospective study, we compared 30-day mortality, major complications and loss of pulmonary function after sleeve resection vs. pneumonectomy in patients less than and in patients more than 70 years old. There was no significant difference in pre-existing co-morbidity, induction therapy and preoperative pulmonary function (FEV1 and DLCO) between the treatment by age-groups.

Patients <70 years had a similar 30-day mortality after sleeve lobectomy and pneumonectomy (0 vs. 3%) which corresponds to those reported in the literature. Pneumonectomy was associated with more cardiac complications (5% vs. 0) and broncho-pleural fistulas (6% vs. 0), and sleeve lobectomy with more pulmonary complications (42% vs. 20%).

In patients >70 years, pneumonectomy resulted in a higher 30-day mortality rate than sleeve lobectomy (15% vs. 0). The high mortality rate after pneumonectomy in this age group was similar to that reported in the literature and may be related to induction therapy and right-sided procedures which are both known to increase the mortality after pneumonectomy. In addition, 8% of the patients with pneumonectomy developed a broncho-pleural fistula, whereas no airway complications were observed after sleeve lobectomy in this age group.

There are actually no data available comparing the loss of pulmonary function after pneumonectomy and sleeve lobectomy in different age populations. In our series, pneumonectomy was associated with a significantly higher postoperative loss of FEV1 than sleeve lobectomy in both age groups. However, age per se did not influence the loss of pulmonary function for a given type of resection: patients <70 years undergoing pneumonectomy had a similar loss of FEV1 and DLCO with patients >70 years undergoing pneumonectomy and the same holds true for sleeve lobectomy.

In conclusion, our results suggest that sleeve resections may bear a therapeutic advantage compared to pneumonectomy, especially in elderly patients, but further studies with larger sized treatment by age-groups are necessary to confirm these results.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ma Z, Dong A, Fan J, Cheng H. Does sleeve lobectomy concomitant with or without pulmonary artery reconstruction (double sleeve) have favourable results for non-small cell lung cancer compared with pneumonectomy? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;32:20–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Dexter EU, Jahangir N, Kohman LJ. Resection for lung cancer in the elderly patient. Thorac Surg Clin 2004;14:163–171.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Thomas P, Piraux M, Jacques LF, Gregoire J, Bedard P, Deslauriers J. Clinical patterns and trends of outcome of elderly patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:266–274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Massard G, Moog R, Wihlm JM, Kessler R, Dabbagh A, Lesage A, Roeslin N, Morand G. Broncogenic cancer in the elderly: operaive risk and long-term prognosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;44:40–45.[Medline]
  5. Ciriaco P, Zannini P, Carretta A, Melloni G, Chiesa G, Canneto B, Puglisi A. Surgical treatment of non-small cell lung in patients 70 years of age or older. Int Surg 1998;83:4–7.[Medline]
  6. Wyser C, Stulz P, Soler M, Tamm M, Muller-Brand J, Habicht J, Perruchoud AP, Bolliger CT. Prospective evaluation of an algorithm for the functional assessment of lung resection candidates. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 1999;159:1450–1456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Miller JI Jr. Complications of pulmonary surgery: preoperative evaluation. Chest Surg Clin N Am 1992;2:701–711.
  8. Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Piantadosi S, Fournier B. Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer. Chest 1994;106:329–330.
  9. National Center for Health Statistics, In: Soniak E, US Department of Health and Human Services. Hyattsville (MD): Census; 2000.
  10. Katz S, Branch LG, Branson MH, Papsidero JA, Beck JC, Greer DS. Active life expectancy. N Engl J Med 1983;309:1218–1224.[Abstract]
  11. Kiser AC, Detterbeck FC. General aspects of surgical treatment. In:, Detterbeck FC, Rivera MP, Socinski M, Rosenmann JE, Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001;141–143.
  12. Leo F, Scanagatta P, Baglio P, Radice D, Veronesi G, Solli P, Petrella F, Spaggiari L. The risk of pneumonectomy over the age of 70. A case-control study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:779–782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. Bolukbas, T. Bergmann, A. Fisseler-Eckhoff, and J. Schirren
Short- and long-term outcome of sleeve resections in the elderly
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 37(1): 30 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. M. B. van Tilburg, H. Stam, H. C. Hoogsteden, and R. J. van Klaveren
Pre-operative pulmonary evaluation of lung cancer patients: a review of the literature
Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2009; 33(5): 1206 - 1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Hans-Beat Ris
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melloul, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ris, H.-B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melloul, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ris, H.-B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS