This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Roberto Gaeta Salvatore Lentini Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gaeta, R. Articles by Lentini, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gaeta, R. Articles by Lentini, S. Related Collections Related Article

eComment: Port-access mitral valve repair in re-do surgery

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Policlinic Hospital, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy

Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery?

We read with interest this collective review of Lydia Richardson and coworkers [1]. The authors focused on whether port-access mitral valve repair reduces the recovery period of patients compared to the conventional sternotomy approach. The 13 papers representing the best evidence on the subject, demonstrated that patients who undergo minimally invasive mitral valve repair have a shorter ICU and total hospital stay than those who undergo the sternotomy approach. This in spite of the longer reported operative time and increase in bypass time being around 30 min.

The surgical experience of our group is of a total of 1734 minimally invasive cardiac surgical operations done either via a ministernotomy (921 patients) or a port access technique (813 patients) starting March 1997 to June 2007. We believe that a stronger evidence of advantages in terms of blood losses, complications and eventually hospital stay may be seen in redo cases. In this group of patients, minimally invasive surgery (via either ministernotomy or port access technique) has reduced operative times.

Re-do operation through a median sternotomy, with dissection of the adhesions is time-consuming. Reducing the width of the operative field, as in minimally invasive surgery, the total time of the operation is decreased and may be less than surgery performed by conventional sternotomy [2–4].

	References

Top References

 

1. Richardson L, Richardson M, Hunter S. Is a port-access mitral valve repair superior to the sternotomy approach in accelerating postoperative recovery? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:678–683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Adams DH, Aklog L, Aranki SF, Couper GS, Rizzo RJ, Cohn LH. Partial upper re-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement or re-replacement after previous cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;18:282–286.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Svensson LG, Nadolny EM, Kimmel WA. Minimal access aortic surgery including re-operations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:30–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Glower DD, Siegel LC, Frischmeyer KJ, Galloway AC, Ribakove GH, Grossi EA, Robinson NB, Ryan WH, Colvin SB. Predictors of outcome in a multicenter port-access valve registry. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1054–1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Roberto Gaeta Salvatore Lentini Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gaeta, R. Articles by Lentini, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gaeta, R. Articles by Lentini, S. Related Collections Related Article