ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:662-663. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.176024A
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Salvatore Lentini
Francesco Monaco
Roberto Gaeta
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lentini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lentini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

eComment

eComment: Surgical options in emergency pulmonary embolectomy

Salvatore Lentini, Fabrizio Tancredi, Francesco Monaco and Roberto Gaeta

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Policlinic Hospital, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy

Hemodynamic collapse during pulmonary embolectomy due to loss of venous return from acute occlusion of the cardiopulmonary venous cannula with thromboembolus

We read with interest the article of Augoustides and co-workers. We congratulate the authors for the successful result of the treatment, which in these acute patients is not always easy to obtain [1].

The authors describe a case of mechanical obstruction of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) venous cannula during pulmonary embolectomy. They describe a 43-year-old lady with respiratory distress syndrome and consecutive acute severe hypotension. The pre-operative echocardiogram was consistent with massive acute pulmonary embolism, and it had showed already ‘serpentine thromboemboli in the right atrium’.

With the present e-comment we would like to discuss some surgical details. In particular the choice of right atrial cannulation at the start of CPB, and the choice of the aorta cross-clamping. Concerning the choice of right atrium cannulation, the authors explain that this conduct of CPB was deliberately chosen to minimize the risk of thromboembolism, with a manoeuvre performed with a minimal touch technique. We suppose with the aim to decreasing the tension on the right heart, and changing to a bicaval cannulation afterward.

In our experience of pulmonary embolectomy in emergency, we usually perform a bicaval cannulation at the beginning, even with very unstable patients. We insert one metallic right angle tip cannula directly in the superior vena cava without touching the heart. The other cannula for the inferior vena cava is already connected to the venous line, but is clamped. In this way, it is already possible to start a partial cardiopulmonary bypass, and to decrease the tension on the right heart. Then, we proceed to cannulate the inferior vena cava, through a purse string suture done very near to the inferior vena cava, to reduce the manipulation and minimize the risk of embolism. Once cardiopulmonary bypass is fully established we snare both cavae, and we get access to the right atrium, the ventricle, and the pulmonary arteries. We usually do not cross-clamp the aorta, and we perform the procedure on the beating heart. We manage to obtain a clean surgical field using adequate suction and eventually some very short periods of reduced CPB flow. This, in order to avoid myocardial ischemia.

To minimize the risk of embolism another option in cases with thrombus inside the right atrium diagnosed by echocardiography is the venous drainage of the lower part of the body obtained via a femoral cannulation using a long cannula in the inferior vena cava, and cannulation of the superior vena cava through a direct approach or through jugular cannulation as we usually do in minimally invasive heart port technique.


    Reference
 Top
 Reference
 

  1. Augoustides JGT, Plappert T, Bavaria JE. Hemodynamic collapse during pulmonary embolectomy due to loss of venous return from acute occlusion of the cardiopulmonary venous cannula with thromboembolus. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:661–663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Hemodynamic collapse during pulmonary embolectomy due to loss of venous return from acute occlusion of the cardiopulmonary venous cannula with thromboembolus
John G.T. Augoustides, Ted Plappert, and Joseph E. Bavaria
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 661-662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Salvatore Lentini
Francesco Monaco
Roberto Gaeta
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lentini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, R.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lentini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Gaeta, R.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS