Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:491-498. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.178343
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Best evidence topic - Cardiac general |
Is blood cardioplegia superior to crystalloid cardioplegia?
Samuel Jacoba,
Antonios Kallikourdisa,
Frank Sellkeb and
Joel Dunningc,*
a Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
b Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
c Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
Received 20 February 2008;
received in revised form 20 February 2008;
accepted 24 February 2008
*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44 1642 850850.
E-mail address: joeldunning{at}doctors.org.uk (J. Dunning).
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether blood cardioplegia is clinically superior to crystalloid cardioplegia for myocardial protection. Altogether 501 papers were identified. We selected 22 papers that represented the best evidence to answer the question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. This is a difficult topic to review, as the techniques studied in the many trials performed vary widely. Factors which may vary include warm or cold blood cardioplegia, antegrade and retrograde administration, systemic hypothermia or normothermia, topical heart cooling, high and low potassium solutions, ‘hot shots’, warm induction, volume of cardioplegia, patient factors and bypass times. However, three papers stand out. The meta-analysis of 34 randomised trials by Prof Fremes (2006) found a significantly lower incidence of low output syndrome (LOS) and CK-MB release with blood cardioplegia. He found no differences in myocardial infarction or mortality. This meta-analysis was confounded, however, by the fact that he was unable to extract data on LOS and CK-MB from the two largest trials which contributed over half the patients in his paper and are significantly larger than all other studies. The first paper by Ovrum (2006) randomised 1440 patients to antegrade cold blood or crystalloid and found no clinical differences, and the second paper by Martin (1994) of 1001 patients compared warm blood to cold crystalloid but the study had to be stopped due to a high incidence of neurological events in the warm blood group. We reviewed a further 18 randomised trials reporting over 50 patients. Of these, 10 reported some statistically significant clinical outcomes in favour of blood cardioplegia and five reported statistically significant differences in enzyme release in favour of blood cardioplegia. A recent survey of UK practice found that 56% of surgeons use cold blood cardioplegia, 14% use warm blood cardioplegia, 14% use crystalloid cardioplegia, 21% use retrograde infusion and 16% do not use any cardioplegia. The papers presented in our review support most of these practices!
Key Words: Cardiopulmonary bypass; Blood cardioplegia; Crystalloid cardioplegia; Cardioplegic
|
1. Introduction
|
|---|
A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. This is fully described in the ICVTS [1].
|
2. Three-part question
|
|---|
In [patients undergoing cardioplegic cardiopulmonary bypass] is [blood cardioplegia or crystalloid cardioplegia] superior [for myocardial protection].
|
3. Clinical scenario
|
|---|
You have always used blood cardioplegia but you start to work for a consultant who uses crystalloid cardioplegia. He evangelically states that crystalloid is cheaper, quicker and gives you a better view when performing distal coronary artery anastomoses. You have always been told that blood is superior as it is a more physiological buffer and has an important oxygen carrying capacity. You then realise that you have never actually read a single paper on the comparison between these two solutions even though you use it every day and resolve to look up the evidence.
|
4. Search strategy
|
|---|
Medline 1950–Feb 2008 using the OVID interface.
[blood.mp] AND [crystalloid.mp] AND [cardioplegia.mp OR cardioplegic.mp OR exp cardioplegic solutions/].
|
5. Search outcome
|
|---|
Medline found 501 abstracts. We chose to exclude RCTs with fewer than 50 patients and selected 22 papers as representing the best evidence on this topic. These are presented in Table 1.
|
6. Results
|
|---|
Prof Fremes' Toronto group [2] in 2006 performed a meta-analysis of 34 randomised controlled trials. Most were small and there were only two with more than 1000 patients in total and another three with more than 100 patients in the blood cardioplegia arm. In total there were 5000 patients included in these studies (but half were from two studies). They reported that the incidence of low output syndrome (LOS) was significantly lower with blood cardioplegia (BCP) with an odds ratio of 0.54 (95% CI 0.34–0.84) and the CK-MB release was higher by a weighted mean difference of 5.7 U/l with crystalloid cardioplegia (CCP) at 24 h (95% CI 1.6–10.2). There was no difference in the aggregated MI or mortality rates. However, there are significant weaknesses to these findings as the authors were unable to obtain any data on low output syndrome or CK-MB from the two studies containing more than 1000 patients, despite successfully contacting Ovrum's group which did collect some of this data [3, 4]. Thus, the LOS aggregate finding was based on only 10 of the 34 trials (879 patients), and the CK-MB findings came from only seven trials. Furthermore, while CK-MB at 24 h appears in their abstract as a significant finding, in their full paper they report that there is no clinically significant difference at 1 h or 48 h post-operatively in CK-MB. Additionally, cold blood cardioplegia and warm blood cardioplegia studies are combined with a range of systemic temperatures.
The largest prospective randomised controlled trial (PRCT) was by Ovrum et al. [3] in 2004. Two surgeons performed 1440 CABG procedures randomised to either cold CCP or cold BCP. The clinical course, systemic temperature and delivery methods were unified for all patients and emergencies, redos and low EF patients were included. No differences were seen for perioperative myocardial infarction, or mortality. Additionally, in subgroups of patients at higher operative risk (female sex, age >70 years, unstable angina, diabetes, emergency operation, ejection fraction <0.50, crossclamping time >50 min, and EuroSCORE >4) were identical.
The other large trial was conducted by Martin et al. [4] from 1990–1992. One thousand-and-one patients undergoing elective CABG were randomised to either (1) systemic hypothermia at 28° and intermittent 25 mEq/l potassium cold crystalloid cardioplegia or (2) antegrade high potassium (20 mEq/l) warm blood cardioplegia followed by continuous retrograde low potassium (19 mEq/l) warm blood cardioplegia. There was an unexpectedly high rate of perioperative strokes, delayed stroke and total neurologic events, which caused the study to be stopped early. At this stage there were no differences in mortality, IABP use, inotrope use, or hospital stay. When considering the blood vs. crystalloid debate, this paper confounds the issue, as despite its large size, both the equivalent myocardial outcomes and adverse neurological outcomes may be explained in terms of temperature rather than cardioplegic solution.
No other RCTs come near these two in terms of numbers, and only three have more than 100 patients in the blood cardioplegia group. Iverson et al. [22] in 1984 reported slight but significant improvements in left ventricular stroke work index and creatinine kinase levels in an RCT of 207 patients, Lajos et al. [11] compared three groups, warm BCP, cold BCP and cold CCP in 163 patients. There were no differences between the cold BCP and cold CCP groups but the warm heart consumed three times the myocardial oxygen of the cold heart and 3 of 4 strokes occurred in the warm BCP group. Jacquet et al. [23] compared intermittent warm cardioplegia with antegrade and retrograde cold cardioplegia with systemic hypothermia in 200 patients. There were no differences in death, stroke, inotrope use or IABP but ventricular fibrillation after cross-clamp release was more common with crystalloid and more vasoconstrictors were needed on bypass with systemic normothermia and blood cardioplegia.
We selected a further 15 RCTs reporting over 50 patients (summarised in Table 1). Of these, eight reported statistically significant clinical outcomes in favour of blood cardioplegia and five reported statistically significant differences in enzyme release in favour of blood cardioplegia. No studies reported findings in favour of crystalloid cardioplegia other than outcomes such as vasoconstrictor use on bypass and myocardial oxygen uptake during bypass, which occurred when cold crystalloid was compared to warm blood cardioplegia.
Thus, the literature is far from conclusive. This is reflected in a survey of practice in the UK [24] from 2004 which found that of the surgeons performing on-pump CABG, 56% use cold blood cardioplegia, 14% use warm blood cardioplegia, 14% use crystalloid cardioplegia, 21% use retrograde infusion and 16% do not use any cardioplegia, preferring cross-clamp fibrillation!
|
7. Clinical bottom line
|
|---|
The meta-analysis of 34 randomised trials by Prof Fremes (2006) found a significantly lower incidence of low output syndrome (LOS) and CK-MB release with blood cardioplegia. He found no differences in myocardial infarction or mortality. Ovrum (2006) randomised 1440 patients to antegrade cold blood or crystalloid and found no clinical differences, and the second paper by Martin (1994) of 1001 patients compared warm blood to cold crystalloid but the study had to be stopped due to a high incidence of neurological events in the warm blood group. We reviewed a further 18 randomised trials reporting over 50 patients. Of these, 10 reported some statistically significant clinical outcomes in favour of blood cardioplegia and five reported statistically significant differences in enzyme release in favour of blood cardioplegia.
|
References
|
|---|
- Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:405–409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Guru V, Omura J, Alghamdi AA, Weisel R, Fremes S. Is blood superior to crystalloid cardioplegia? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Circulation 2006;114(Suppl_I):I-331–I-338.[Medline]
- Ovrum E, Tangen G, Tollofsrud S, Oystese R, Ringdal MA, Istad R. Cold blood cardioplegia versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia: a prospective randomized study of 1440 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:860–865.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Martin TD, Craver JM, Gott JP, Weintraub WS, Ramsay J, Mora CT, Guyton RA. Prospective, randomized trial of retrograde warm blood cardioplegia: myocardial benefit and neurologic threat. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:298–302.[Abstract]
- Rinne T, Pehkonen E, Kaukinen S, Tarkka M. Comparison of cardioprotection with crystalloid and blood cardioplegia in CABG patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993;7:679–683.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Shanewise JS, Kosinski AS, Coto JA, Jones EL. Prospective, randomized trial comparing blood and oxygenated crystalloid cardioplegia in re-operative coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:1166–1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sirlak M, Eryilmaz S, Yazicioglu L, Kiziltepe U, Inan MB, Tasoz R, Aral A, Akalin H. Conduction disturbances in coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Cardiol 2003;92:43–48.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Brat R, Tosovsky J, Januska J, Derych L, Velkoborsky S, Bruk V, Dominik J. Comparison between blood and crystalloid cardioplegia in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary surgery. Acta Medica 2000;43:107–110.[Medline]
- Gasior Z, Krejca M, Szmagala P, Bochenek A. Long-term left ventricular systolic function assessment following CABG. A prospective, randomised study. Blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2000;41:695–702.[Medline]
- Isomura T, Hisatomi K, Sato T, Hayashida N, Ohishi K. Interrupted warm blood cardioplegia for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:133–138.[Abstract]
- Lajos TZ, Espersen CC, Lajos PS, Fiedler RC, Bergsland J, Joyce LT. Comparison of cold versus warm cardioplegia. Crystalloid antegrade or retrograde blood. Circulation 1993;88:II344–II349.[Medline]
- Hendrikx M, Jiang H, Gutermann H, Toelsie J, Renard D, Briers A, Pauwels JL, Mees U. Release of cardiac troponin I in antegrade crystalloid versus cold blood cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:452–459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Elwatidy AM, Fadalah MA, Bukhari EA, Aljubair KA, Syed A, Ashmeg AK, Alfagih MR. Antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia vs. antegrade/retrograde cold and tepid blood cardioplegia in CABG. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:447–453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Biagioli B, Giomarelli P, Gnudi G, Artioli E, Simeone F, Paolini G, Marchetti L, Grossi A. Myocardial function in early hours after coronary artery bypass grafting: comparison of two cardioplegic methods. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1315–1323.[Abstract]
- Mullen JC, Fremes SE, Weisel RD, Christakis GT, Ivanov J, Madonik MM, Houle S, McLaughlin PR. Right ventricular function: a comparison between blood and crystalloid cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg 1987;43:17–24.[Abstract]
- Ibrahim MF, Venn GE, Young CP, Chambers DJ. A clinical comparative study between crystalloid and blood-based St Thomas' hospital cardioplegic solution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:75–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wandschneider W, Winter S, Thalmann M, Howanietz N, Deutsch M. Crystalloid versus blood cardioplegia in coronary by-pass surgery. A prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 consecutive adults. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1994;35(6 Suppl 1):85–89.[Medline]
- Fremes SE, Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Mickle DA, Madonik MM, Ivanov J, Harding R, Seawright SJ, Houle S, McLaughlin PR. A clinical trial of blood and crystalloid cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;88(5 Pt 1):726–741.[Abstract]
- Pichon H, Chocron S, Alwan K, Toubin G, Kaili D, Falcoz P, Latini L, Clement F, Viel JF, Etievent JP. Crystalloid versus cold blood cardioplegia and cardiac troponin I release. Circulation 1997;96:316–320.[Medline]
- Jin XY, Gibson DG, Pepper JR. Early changes in regional and global left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement. Comparison of crystalloid, cold blood, and warm blood cardioplegias. Circulation 1995;92(9 Suppl):II155–II162.[Medline]
- Christakis GT, Fremes SE, Weisel RD, Madonik MM, McDonough JH, Tittley JG, Mickle DA, Ivanov J, Mickleborough LL, Goldman BS. Reducing the risk of urgent revascularization for unstable angina: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:764–772.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Iverson LI, Young JN, Ennix CL Jr. Ecker RR, Moretti RL, Lee J, Hayes RL, Farrar MP, May RD, Masterson R. Myocardial protection: a comparison of cold blood and cold crystalloid cardioplegia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;87:509–516.[Abstract]
- Jacquet LM, Noirhomme PH, Van Dyck MJ, El Khoury GA, Matta AJ, Goenen MJ, Dion RA. Randomized trial of intermittent antegrade warm blood versus cold crystalloid cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:471–477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Karthik S, Grayson AD, Oo AY, Fabri BM. A survey of current myocardial protection practices during coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Roy Coll Surg 2004;86:413–415.[CrossRef]
Related Articles
-
Long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: does the type of cardioplegia matter?
- Mohamed F. Ibrahim and Amal A. Refaat
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 498.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Is blood cardioplegia superior to crystalloid cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery?
- Shahzad G. Raja
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 498-499.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
T. Ghazy, O. Allham, A. Ouda, U. Kappert, and K. Matschke
Is repeated administration of blood-cardioplegia really necessary?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
May 1, 2009;
8(5):
517 - 521.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Haddad, P. Couture, C. Tousignant, and A. Y. Denault
The Right Ventricle in Cardiac Surgery, a Perioperative Perspective: II. Pathophysiology, Clinical Importance, and Management
Anesth. Analg.,
February 1, 2009;
108(2):
422 - 433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. B. Fallouh and D. J. Chambers
Is blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia relevant? Significantly improved protection may require new cardioplegic concepts!
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
December 1, 2008;
7(6):
1162 - 1163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Ibrahim and A. A. Refaat
Long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: does the type of cardioplegia matter?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
June 1, 2008;
7(3):
498 - 498.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. G. Raja
Is blood cardioplegia superior to crystalloid cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
June 1, 2008;
7(3):
498 - 499.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
Top
Abstract
1. Introduction