ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:473. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.153056A
© 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Narcis Hudorovic
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudorovic, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudorovic, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Institutional report - Cardiac general

ICVTS on-line discussion A EuroSCORE and specialised databases

Narcis Hudorovic

University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb 10000, Croatia

Evaluation of cardiac scoring models for an Austrian cardiac register

eComment: The EuroSCORE is probably refined enough for improved informed consent versus aggregated results but should only be used for inter-institutional benchmarking with great caution. In a regional context, the system of continuous monitoring of hospitals' clinical performance relies on the regional hospitals' databases. The most valid feature of these databases is the inclusion of a description of patient's surgical risk expressed through the EuroSCORE [1]. Maybe, the most valuable tool to improve quality monitoring system is implementation of a regional registry of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Specialized clinical databases are a more clinically oriented source of information and they improve case-mix adjustment procedures, and provide more accurate mortality figures for each centre.

There is a consensus in a surgical community on the need for monitoring hospital performance, it should be noted that the choice of one source of information over another implicitly implies also a choice between different approaches to quality improvement and models of accountability [2]. In such a context, the main added value of clinical databases is the degree of direct participation of surgical teams required by their implementation.

Three years ago, we started to construct our regional cardiac database. The process of registry development showed that patients with cardiac disease who experienced combat situations seemed particularly troubled by enhanced emotionality. War veterans with cardiac disease clearly regarded themselves as irritable, tense and moody worriers. Sensitization was another characteristic found in these patients with/without cardiac disease. The combination of the above items might support Byrnes view that manifest cardiac-prone behaviors arising from an underlying existence of competitiveness achieve their greatest pathophysiological toxicity if their expression and realization are frustrated. As we expected, neuroticism played a major role in the creation of cardiac registry because these patients must be properly included or excluded in the database. Until today, we have not been able to properly resolve the problem of evaluation and scoring of these patients within the regional database. The experience of the Austrian colleagues will certainly help us.

In summary, selection of a predictive model of the Austrian cardiac register [3] seems promising. Excising the adverse event rates in regional cardiovascular departments must be of continuing concern and underlines the need for continued quality improvement efforts and creation of regional clinical databases to provide valid measures of outcome.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16:9–13.[Medline]
  2. Shahian DM, Normand SL, Torchiana DF, Lewis SM, Pastore JO, Kuntz RE, Dreyer PI. Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72:2155–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Staudinger O, Ostermann H, Laufer G, Schistek R, Staudinger B, Tilg B. Evaluation of cardiac scoring models for an Austrian cardiac register. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007; 6:470–473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Evaluation of cardiac scoring models for an Austrian cardiac register
Oskar Staudinger, Herwig Ostermann, Günther Laufer, Roland Schistek, Bettina Staudinger, and Bernhard Tilg
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2007 6: 470-473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Narcis Hudorovic
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudorovic, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudorovic, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS