ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:442-446. doi:10.1510/icvts.2006.147769
© 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mastoraki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geroulanos, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mastoraki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geroulanos, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrowRelated Article

Work in progress report - Coronary

Cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery

Sotiria Mastoraki, Argyris Michalopoulos*, Ioannis Kriaras and Stefanos Geroulanos

Department of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece

Received 1 November 2006; received in revised form 22 March 2007; accepted 23 March 2007

*Corresponding author: Tel.: +30-210-66616760.

E-mail address: amichalopoulos{at}hol.gr (A. Michalopoulos).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Nosocomial-acquired infections remain a serious problem in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence of nosocomial infections in patients undergoing CABG surgery within two periods (1994 and 2003). A single dose of a second generation cephalosporin (cefuroxime) was administered as antibiotic prophylaxis in all patients. There was no statistical significant difference regards to the incidence of hospital-acquired infections between these two periods (4.9% in 1994 and 5.6% in 2003, P=0.62). The most frequent types of postoperative infections were the respiratory tract infection (2.3%) in the first period and the superficial surgical site infection (3.1%) in the second period. The majority of isolated pathogens were Gram-positive cocci (68%) in both periods. The majority of incisional surgical site infections and of central venous catheter-related infections were attributed to Staphylococcus coagulase negative strains. Only one episode of hospital-acquired infection due to a resistant Gram-negative bacterium was recorded during the second period. A single-dose of cefuroxime remains the antibiotic prophylaxis of choice in adult patients submitted to CABG surgery. It is still associated with a low incidence of postoperative infections mainly due to sensitive pathogens.

Key Words: CABG surgery; Postoperative infections; Antibiotic prophylaxis; Cefuroxime; Cephalosporins


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
Patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery are at risk for serious postoperative infections [1]. These nosocomial infections lead to increased morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay and raised hospital costs [2]. Thus, antibiotic prophylaxis is widely used in this type of surgery. A relatively large number of comparative trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery have been published [3, 4]. Each of them examined the use of one or more antibiotics trying to reduce serious postoperative infections. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the early postoperative infection rate in adult patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery in the years 1994 and 2003 at the same institution where, within the last 12 years, a single dose of a second generation cephalosporin (cefuroxime) was administered as antibiotic prophylaxis.


    2. Patients and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
2.1. Study design-setting

This is a retrospective case–control study conducted at the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece which is a referral center for patients undergoing open heart surgery. Approval was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the center. The primary end-point of the study was the comparison of incidence of postoperative infectious complications in both groups of enrolled patients.

2.2. Patient population

The study enrolled 1232 adult patients (age >16 years) who underwent isolated CABG surgery with the use of extracorporeal circulation within two periods. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group (Group A) consisted of 429 patients who underwent CABG surgery in 1994. Group B consisted of 803 patients who were submitted to CABG surgery nine years later (2003). In both groups, cefuroxime was given intravenously as antibiotic prophylaxis (3 g single doses) at the induction of general anesthesia.

2.3. Data collection

The study was designed according to a database program including demographics, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class, preoperative infection and use of antibiotics. Patients with pre-existing infection or receipt of antibiotics during the last two days before surgery, with hypersensitivity to beta-lactams, pre-existing intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or with left ventricular assist device (LVAD), as well as the patients who died in the operating room and in the cardiothoracic ICU during the first postoperative day, were excluded from this study.

We recorded all postoperative infectious complications that occurred within a period of 30 days regardless of the length of stay in the ICU and in the hospital generally. All data referring to the site of infection, positive cultures, antibiotic susceptibilities, and administered antibiotics were also prospectively collected.

2.4. Management

All these surgical procedures were performed by the same three surgical teams. General anesthesia was provided by the same three teams according to a set protocol. The same myocardial protection protocol was used in all patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given in all patients undergoing CABG surgery based on a standard protocol (as described above). All patients were admitted to the cardiothoracic ICU immediately after surgery and subsequently transferred to the ward according to the improvement of their medical condition. If bacteremia was suspected, ≥2 blood samples for culture were obtained from separate sites before the initiation of antibiotic therapy.

2.5. Definitions

An infection was considered as nosocomial when developed 48 h after hospital admission during the first 30 postoperative days [5]. Pneumonia, bacteremia, surgical wound infection, urinary tract infection or nosocomial infections of other body sites or fluids were defined based on the guidelines published from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [6].

2.6. Statistical analysis

Analyses were performed with SPSS 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Tests on categorical variables were based on Pearson {chi}2 statistics in the case of 2 by 2 tables. The comparison between the isolated microorganisms was determined using independent-samples t-test analysis. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    3. Results
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
In 1994, a total of 21 patients (4.9%) developed a postoperative infection, while in 2003 the corresponding number was 46 (5.6%) (P=0.62). The sites of all infections in both groups are presented in Table 1. The most frequent site of postoperative infection in group A was the respiratory tract (2.3% vs. 0.6% in group B). On the contrary, the most frequent kind of infection in group B was the superficial surgical site infection (3.1% vs. 0.5% of group A). However, there was no difference between the development of deep surgical site infection and of postoperative infective endocarditis where only one patient of each group presented with these types of infection. There was also no statistical significant difference between the two groups in regard to catheter-related infections, urinary tract infections, and bacteremia/candidemia.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Site of nosocomial infections in the study cohort of 1232 CABG patients

 
Isolated pathogens are presented in Table 2. In 1994, a total of 21 micro-organisms were isolated in all patients, while in 2003, the corresponding number was 46. Gram-positive cocci were isolated in 14 patients of group A (14/21, 66.6%) and in 25 patients of group B (25/46, 54.3%). Staphylococcus coagulase negative strains were the predominant isolates among gram-positive cocci in both studied periods [23 of 39 (58.9%)]. None of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in both periods was methicillin-resistant (MRSA). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in seven patients in group A (33.3%) and in 16 patients of group B (34.7%). Of these, only one strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae was resistant to three antimicrobial agents (3rd generation cephalosporins, antipseudomonal penicillins and quinolones). No patient developed an infection due to fungi in group A; in contrast, Candida was isolated in 4 of 46 patients (8.7%) of group B, without reaching statistical significance (P=0.24).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Microbiology in both groups

 
Table 3 presents the association of isolated pathogens and the site of infection. The majority of incisional surgical site infections (10 out of 27, 37%) and of central venous catheter-related infections (9 out of 11, 81.8%) were attributed to Staphylococcus coagulase negative strains.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Correlation of pathogen and site of infection

 
Clinical response of the infection was observed in all patients of group A (21/21) and in 42 out of 46 patients of group B (91.3%). Unresponsiveness was observed in 4/46 (14.7%) episodes of infection during the second period. Cefuroxime, in the dose of 3 g intravenously, did not cause any registered side-effect. Infections were not responsible for any death in 1994 but in 2003, 5 out of 46 (10.8%) CABG patients with postoperative infection died because of septic shock/multiple organ failure (n=4) and cardiogenic shock/multiple organ failure (n=1).


    4. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
The main finding of this study is the same incidence of nosocomial infections (approx. 5%) in adult patients undergoing CABG surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass between these two studied periods (1994 and 2003) where the same antibiotic prophylaxis (a single dose of a second generation cephalosporin) was used in all patients.

Another interesting finding of the study is the very low incidence of nosocomial-acquired infections due to resistant pathogens, such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria (e.g. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii) in both studied periods. There are several reasons which could explain this fact. Our Center is not a general hospital, but a tertiary Center specializing exclusively in heart diseases. In addition, the majority of operations are undergone electively while the patients are usually admitted to our Center directly from their home. A strict policy has also been followed since the beginning of the Center's function regarding the prevention of hospital-acquired infections (control for hand washing of personnel, routine examination for nosocomial-acquired infection, and isolation of postoperative patients with nosocomial infection, as well as recording/surveillance of all episodes of infection). All patients transferred to our Center from other hospitals are isolated and all their foreign bodies are removed immediately; bacteriological examinations of blood, urine, and central venous catheter tips are performed just after their admission. In addition, the majority of candidates for elective cardiac surgery are examined preoperatively by the doctors of our Cardiac Center in order to exclude any infectious disease, while all patients with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergo heart surgery without signs or symptoms of respiratory tract infection or bronchospasm.

Although the interval period was 9 years between the two examined periods and the conditions of care have been ameliorated, more high-risk patients have been involved. For example, in our Center the mean age of patients submitted to cardiac surgery has increased from 60–69 years. However, surgeons, anesthesiologists and intensivists have stayed more or less the same. The most serious difference in the number of infections between the two groups (as it is shown in Table 1) has to do with the increase of the incisional surgical site infections during the second period. This observation can be explained by a more meticulous surveillance of postoperative infections during the last years. Intensivists and surgeons were more careful with the observation leading to a pronounced bacteriological examination of the wound. As the number of cultures has been raised, the positive results are more frequent than in the past. In most of them, only one pathogen was isolated without serious complications. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequent isolated pathogen followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus (none of them was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). This finding is in agreement with previous studies [7]. The comparison of respiratory tract infections between the two groups shows a significant decrease during 2003. This could be explained by the amelioration of patients' care during mechanical ventilatory support.

Cardiac surgery enters mainly into the class I of Altemeier's (‘clean surgery’) and need no antibiotic prophylaxis as documented by Lehot, in 1994 [8]. However, postoperative infections are serious and often life-threatening complications in this group of patients. The incidence of postoperative infections in patients submitted to open heart surgery is approximately 5–6% [9, 10]. Many risk factors may predispose to postoperative infections. These are older age, female gender, low preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, history of pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and immunosuppression. In addition, perioperative factors such as prolonged bypass time, excessive blood transfusion, low cardiac output syndrome, development of acute renal failure and the use of intra-aortic balloon pump were found to be predictors of development of postoperative infections after cardiac surgery [10]. These infectious complications are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stay, and increased hospitalization costs [11].

Cefuroxime is a second generation cephalosporin with documented low toxicity. It has increased stability to ß-lactamase enzymes, broad antibacterial spectrum and good tissue penetration. Cefuroxime has the highest bactericidal effect at concentrations four- to eight-fold above the minimum concentration (MIC). The time during which the concentration remains above the MIC is the most important factor related to the bactericidal activity of this antimicrobial agent. The maintenance of elevated plasma concentrations for a short period of time does not increase antimicrobial action against most bacteria [12]. This is the reason why a single dose of cefuroxime (3 g) administered intravenously just prior to the induction of anesthesia is still effective in case of prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time. The recommended antimicrobials for cardiac operations include cefazoline or cefuroxime administered for <24 h or maximum up to 72 h in high risk patients [13].

The combination of cefuroxime with an aminoglycoside may be necessary when infection prevalence due to Gram-negative (–) bacilli is high in a specific hospital environment or with vancomycin if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or epidermidis are endemic. A review sponsored by the American Society of Infectious Diseases and endorsed by both it and the Surgical Infection Society recommends that vancomycin can be given instead of cephalosporin to patients who are allergic to cephalosporins or in settings where infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are prevalent or MRSA strains are frequently isolated pathogens in postoperative wound infections [13]. Although several reports suggest that the carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among persons without health care-associated risks has recently increased, a meta-analysis of studies dealing with community-acquired MRSA colonization among community members showed a very low prevalence [14].

Broad-spectrum antibiotics should be avoided as antimicrobial prophylaxis because they promote the development of antimicrobial resistance and may have a considerable effect on the isolation of microorganisms from various specimens increasing the probability for false negative cultures [15]. They should be administered as prophylaxis only in patients previously colonized from multi-resistant pathogens and mainly for the treatment of documented nosocomial infections due to resistant pathogens when sensitivity exists.

In conclusion, comparing the rate of postoperative infections in adult patients undergoing isolated CABG surgery between 1994 and 2003, we conclude that a single-dose of cefuroxime (3 g administered intravenously just before the induction of general anesthesia) remains effective and safe throughout the years, despite its continuous use. The administration of cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in this group of patients, presents certain advantages, such as easier handling, lower cost and minimum side-effects. For this reason, cefuroxime continues to remain the antibiotic prophylaxis of choice in adult patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.


    Acknowledgements
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 
We thank Ekaterini Mastoraki, MD for her contribution in collecting data for this study.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Patients and methods
 3. Results
 4. Discussion
 Acknowledgements
 References
 

  1. Anonymous. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgens. Medical Letter 2001; 43:1116–1167.
  2. Geroulanos S, Marathia K, Kriaras J, Kadas B. Cephalosporins in surgical prophylaxis. J Chemother 2001; 1:23–26.[Medline]
  3. Soteriou M, Recker F, Geroulanos S, Turina M. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiovascular surgery: a prospective randomized comparative trial of cefazolin vs. ceftriaxone. World J Surg 1989; 13:798–801.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Townsend TR, Reitz BA, Bilker WB, Barlett JG. Clinical trials of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime for antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:664–670.[Abstract]
  5. Gamer JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16:128–140.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Horan TC, Gaynes RP. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. Appendix A: CDC definitions of nosocomial infections. In: Mayahall CG. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control 3rd ed 2004;Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins 1659–1702. In:.
  7. Sharma M, Berriel-Cass D, Baran Jr J. Sternal surgical-site infection following coronary artery bypass grafting: prevalence, microbiology, and complications during a 42-month period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25:468–471.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Lehot JJ, Celard M, Etienne J, Brun Y, Bastien O, Fleurette J, Estanove S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in heart surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1994; 13:5 supplS78–S87.[Medline]
  9. Kriaras I, Michalopoulos A, Michalis A, Palatianos G, Economopoulos G, Anagnostopoulos C, Geroulanos S. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1997; 38:605–610.[Medline]
  10. Michalopoulos A, Geroulanos S, Rosmarakis E, Falagas M. Frequency, characteristics, and predictors of microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29:456–460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fowler Jr VG, O'Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, Corey GR, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Clinical predictors of major infections after cardiac surgery. Circulation 2005; 112:9 supplI358–I365.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Jacobs MR. Optimization of antimicrobial therapy using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001; 7:589–596.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bratzler DW, Houck PM. Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:1706–1715.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Salgado C, Farr B, Calfee D. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a metanalysis of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36:131–139.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Falagas ME, Rosmarakis ES, Rellos K, Michalopoulos A, Samonis G, Prapas SN. Microbiologically documented nosocomial infections after coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132:481–490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

ICVTS on-line discussion A 2007 STS guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis
Joel Dunning
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2007 6: 446. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
J. Dunning
ICVTS on-line discussion A 2007 STS guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, August 1, 2007; 6(4): 446 - 446.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mastoraki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geroulanos, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mastoraki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Geroulanos, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS