|
|
||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:358. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.151621A © 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
ICVTS on-line discussion A Active infective endocarditis-predictability surgical resultsBakoulev Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, Moscow 121552, Russia Early surgery for hospital-acquired and community-acquired active infective endocarditis eComment: In our Center we do not make a distinction between inhospital and out-hospital endocarditis. The main criterion for the distinction of native infective endocarditis is active and non-active [1]. Since 1977 in the Bakoulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery, RAMS, more than 1000 have undergone surgical treatment for active valve infective endocarditis (IE). A long time was needed for the establishment of the correct diagnosis of IE inhibited timely realization of the conception of active IE treatment and/or determined unsuccessfulness of conservative treatment and inadequacy of antibacterial therapy. The majority of patients with IE were operated on because of progressive heart failure, tromboembolism, septic syndrome, and their combination. At hospital stage we lost 13 (7.1%) patients with active IE of the MV and 3 (5.3%) patients with active IE of the TV. The main cause of death was acute heart failure. Hospital mortality in patients with active IE of the MV was reliablyaffected by the following risk factors:
The development of prosthetic endocarditis in patients with IE of the MV was reliably affected by the following risk factors:
The development of prosthetic endocarditis in patients with IE of theTV was reliably affected by:
The formation of paraprosthetic fistula in patients with IE of the MV was reliably affected by:
As for the article Early Surgery for hospital-acquired and communityacquired active infective endocarditis [2], we were intrigued by the concept of similar criteria, but different treatment, yet, unfortunately, the differences are not explained in detail. Our attitude towards active IE can be described as aggressive and radical. High activity of IE, abscesses of the FC and extensive lesions of intracardiac structures, multi-organ failure and neurological deficit do not influence hospital mortality, and should not be considered as the reason for the refusal or delay of surgical intervention. Hospital mortality in patients with active IE of AV valves is influenced by the factors characterizing the severity of septic syndrome and dysfunction of hemodynamic status of patients. According to our data, the results of the use of biological stented prostheses do not differ from those of mechanical prostheses and do not provide resistance to the infection.
Related Article
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |