|
|
||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:356-359. doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.107755 © 2005 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
The complications of repeat median sternotomy in paediatrics: six-months follow-up of consecutive cases
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Coronary artery bypass surgery; Sternotomy; Femoro-femoral bypass; Valve procedure
| 1. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study reviews our experience with a paediatric cardiac population undergoing repeat sternotomy for residual defects or staged repairs, assessing perioperative mortality and morbidity in comparison to a control group with six-months follow-up.
| 2. Material and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2.3. Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as median and range for all descriptive variables. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test for equality of the median values and Fisher's exact test was used for the comparison of percentages. Actuarial data for survival were analysed using KaplanMeier estimates. A value of P<0.05 was taken as significant.| 3. Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3.2. Early morbidity
Cardiac lacerations at repeat sternotomy occurred in 10 of 108 operations (9.2%). None of these patients sustained severe hypotension or cardiac arrest. Among 4 patients, bleeding was controlled without the institution of any emergent femorofemoral bypass. Minor injuries were encountered to aorta in 7 (6.4%), right atrium in 8 (7.4%), laceration to the bioprosthetic conduit in 5 (4.6%) and right ventricle in 2 (1.8%). Severe air embolism was suspected in 2 patients with univentricular hearts because of laceration of the right atrium allowing air entry to the common atrial chamber. Neither of these patients sustained cerebral damage as confirmed by clinical examination and a head computed tomographic scan. They had successful surgical repair. The median age of patients where femorofemoral bypass was used prior to repeat sternotomy procedures was 139 months (range, 5219 months), whereas the median age of the 10 patients who sustained cardiac lacerations was 63 months (range, 42228 months).We compared Group-I (repeat sternotomy) with its own initial operation and then Group-I (repeat sternotomy) with Group II (control), analysing multiple parameters (Tables 23).
|
|
3.4. Group II
The median total blood loss was 21 ml/kg (range,1.3102.8 ml/kg). The median blood requirement was 0.3 units/kg (range, 08.2 units/kg). The most common complications were postpericardiotomy syndrome in 11.1%, low output syndrome in 8.2%, dysrhythmia in 5.6%, sepsis in 5.3%, bleeding in 2.7%, and renal failure in 0.3%.3.5. Groups I and II
When Group I was compared with Group II, the median bypass time and cross-clamp time were 102 min (range, 30270) and 56 min (range, 11187) in Group I, and 66 min (range, 33111) and 25 min (range, 1447) in Group II (P<0.05 in both cases). The median blood loss and blood requirement in groups I and II were not statistically different. The median length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital was 10.2 days (range, 177) and 21 days (range, 1120) in Group-1, and 4.5 days (range, 151) and 7 days (range, 167) in Group-II (P<0.05 in both cases).3.6. Follow-up
Overall rate of complications was not significantly different between two groups in 6 weeks. Group I survivors were followed up for a median of 84 months (range, 4280 months) and Group II survivors for a median of 50.5 months (range, 0.1131 months). In Group-I there was three late sudden deaths at 6, 14, and 18 months, all caused by presumed arrhythmia. In Group-II there were two late deaths at 1.5 months caused by pericardial tamponade and at 11 months caused by superior vena cava thrombosis. Overall survival by KaplanMeier analysis was 95% (group-I) and 97% (group-II) at 6 months' follow-up (P>0.05) and complete heart block, neurological problems and persistence of shunts being the most common reported morbidities in both groups (P>0.05).| 4. Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although some literature has shown a trend towards a higher risk at reoperation [46], our mortality in the paediatric repeat sternotomy group compared with the control group shows no statistical difference (3.7% vs. 2.7%). The higher risk of re-operation in the adult population has been associated with advanced New York Heart Association class. The same parallel cannot be established with our group. Most of our patients were not reoperated on the basis of deteriorating cardiac function, but rather because of conduit or valve obstruction from somatic outgrowth and planned staging in the complex heart defect group.
Perioperative morbidity can be detrimental and recovery from reoperation may be prolonged. The incidence of postoperative complications in Group I and Group II was similar and does not support the notion of increased perioperative morbidity after repeat sternotomy. Nevertheless the LOS in the intensive care unit and in the hospital was significantly longer in Group I than in Group II (P<0.05). We would argue that this increased LOS is related to the type of operation as 45 patients underwent a second-stage Fontan procedure with a median LOS of 22 days (range, 9125 days).
Cardiac structures were entered 10 times at repeat sternotomy requiring emergent institution of femorofemoral bypass in 6 patients. Elective femorofemoral bypass was used in 25 patients. All lacerations were controlled and were not detrimental to the patient's outcome. We established that a calcified conduit behind the sternum and lack of retrosternal space were the main risk factors. The median age of the patients who did and did not undergo femorofemoral bypass was 139 months and 48 months, respectively. It is obvious that the majority of our patients are young children and they fall in a different group. We make every effort to defer cannulating the femoral vessels as it is difficult to obtain proper cardiopulmonary bypass flow and the vessels can be severed more easily.
Blood product strategies have changed over the years. It is interesting to note that blood loss and blood requirements between the repeat sternotomy and the control group were not statistically different. Tranexamic acid is given to all repeat sternotomy patients before operation and is added to the prime. We are unable to explain the statistical difference in blood loss in the subgroups of Group I. However, the initial operation was done at a younger age and was undeniably more complex in many patients, increasing the risk of postoperative coagulopathy.
Some groups maintain that repeat median sternotomy may be facilitated by certain manoeuvres at the time of the initial cardiac procedure. Cliff and associates [7] showed that both serosal injury and blood are necessary to produce cardiac adhesions. Careful handling of the heart and complete evacuation of pericardial blood may reduce postoperative adhesions. Where appropriate, approximation of the pericardium or placement of synthetic biomaterials may also facilitate re-operation. In our series, 41 times pericardial sac was closed and 55 times artificial materials (Dacron/Gortex) were used in initial procedures. The incidence of injuries during sternal re-entry was significantly lower in those patients where pericardial sac was closed initially (P<0.001).
The survival by KaplanMeier analysis is similar in both groups at 120 months. A longer follow-up is required to determine long-term outcome as the combined parameters of repeat sternotomy, myocardial protection, and ventricular dysfunction may express themselves as definite risk factors.
A significant limitation of our study relates to the fact that repeat sternotomy is only one parameter of outcome. Clinical results are more likely to depend on the complexity of the primary diagnosis and the procedure as well as the quality of the surgical repair. The longer intensive care unit and hospital LOS in Group-I exemplifies this fundamental problem.
The main question surgeons confront is whether re-operations have an incremental effect on operative mortality compared with primary procedures. Although the literature [8,9], has shown a varied trend towards complications in the repeat sternotomy group, in our series low incidence of morbidity and mortality in repeat median sternotomy is possible with careful surgical approach. The closure of pericardial sac in initial procedure provides many potential and practical advantages with regard to lesser trauma to underlying structures. In addition, as suggested in previous studies [10,11], a lateral chest X-ray or CT scan may be useful in determining the likelihood and extent of adhesions between the heart, great vessels and the sternum.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Giamberti, M. Chessa, R. Abella, G. Butera, C. Carlucci, H. Nuri, A. Frigiola, and M. Ranucci Morbidity and mortality risk factors in adults with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac reoperations. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1284 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L.S. Morales, F. Zafar, K. A. Arrington, S. M. Gonzalez, E. D. McKenzie, J. S. Heinle, and C. D. Fraser Jr Repeat Sternotomy in Congenital Heart Surgery: No Longer a Risk Factor Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 897 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |