ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:49-51. doi:10.1510/icvts.2004.096065
© 2005 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ioannis Dimarakis
Dilip Oswal
Unnikrishnan R. Nair
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dimarakis, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nair, U. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dimarakis, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nair, U. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other

New ideas - Cardiac general

Single stage sternal reconstruction using titanium mesh for dehiscence following open-heart surgery

Ioannis Dimarakis, Dilip Oswal and Unnikrishnan R. Nair*

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Jubilee Building, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-113-392-5786; fax: +44-113-392-5408. E-mail address: Unnikrishnan.Nair{at}leedsth.nhs.uk (U.R. Nair).

Received 13 August 2004; received in revised form 11 October 2004; accepted 26 October 2004


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Surgical technique
 3. Discussion
 References
 
Wound complications are a well-recognised entity following median sternotomy. Soft tissue reconstruction in the form of muscle flaps generally provides adequate wound stability; nevertheless, skeletal reconstruction of the anterior chest wall is sometimes necessary. We describe a novel technique applied in three patients for reconstructing fragments of the sternum using a titanium mesh that provides a scaffold for the bony union.

Key Words: Sternum; Infection; Wound dehiscence; Complications of surgery


    1. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Surgical technique
 3. Discussion
 References
 
Sternal instability or infection following median sternotomy are rare but important complications of median sternotomy. They are associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased hospital costs and high morbidity and even mortality [1]. Risk factors have been categorized in three groups [2]. Preoperative factors include diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive airway disease, obesity and smoking. The most important perioperative risk factor remains prolonged bypass time with concerns raised about arterial revacsularisation using unilateral or bilateral internal mammary grafts especially in diabetic patients [3,4]. Main postoperative risk factors include the need for transfusions, reexploration and prolonged ventilatory support.

Sternal dehiscence in the presence or not of infection may present a challenge for every cardiac surgeon. Muscle transposition has been reported by many investigators as the treatment of choice for patients in whom sufficient bony fragments are not available for closure with wires [5–7] or even rigid plates [8,9]. Good results have been shown with both rectus abdominis free flaps as well as myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flaps [2]. Bilateral pectoralis major flap repair has also been reported as a safe technique when complete sternal resection is necessitated without the need for extensive reconstructive surgery [10]. Soft tissue reconstruction in the form of muscle flaps generally provides adequate wound stability; nevertheless, skeletal reconstruction of the anterior chest wall might be more appropriate.


    2. Surgical technique
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Surgical technique
 3. Discussion
 References
 
Between October 2000 and May 2002 three patients with sternal dehiscence following coronary artery surgery developed sternal wound dehiscence. All patients were male (age: 53, 54 and 68 years old) and shared the same risk factors for developing sternal complications including obesity (body mass indices: 30.35, 34 and 35), smoking and airway diseases. Pedicled left internal thoracic artery was only unitized in two patients; saphenous vein grafts were used solely in the third case. Two patients presented with deep sternal wound infection in the early postoperative period and the third patient was a late non-infected presentation. Conventional methods using initial debridement and wire removal were unsuccessful.

Standard anesthesia techniques and monitoring lines were used in all patients. Appropriate prophylactic antibiotics were given intravenously at induction. Sternotomy wounds were excised in toto. Any previous stainless steel wires and suture material were removed. Infected and necrotic tissue was debrided along with all sternal or rib edges and sent for microbiology culture.

This was followed by bilateral medial to lateral mobilization of the pectoralis major and overlying soft tissue layers. Along the inferior wound border the rectus sheath was elevated in the same plane. The distance required to achieve midline approximation guided the extent of mobilization.

Internal fixation of the sternum was performed with an individually measured segment of titanium mesh (Surgical Titanium MeshTM, DePuy AcroMed, Inc.) for each patient. This was anchored to the surrounding bony edges with stainless steel wires (Fig. 1). At this point bone marrow from adjacent sharply debrided bony edges was curetted and applied as a paste to the anterior surface of the mesh.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram outlining incorporation of titanium mesh (A) in skeletal defect (B).

 
The reconstructed sternum was covered with the advancement flaps sutured in the midline with absorbable sutures. Two suction drains were inserted between the mesh and the advancement flap. Subcutaneous layers and skin are sutured in routine fashion. Antibiotic coverage based on sensitivities was continued appropriately.

All three patients achieved excellent sternal stability with full bony union on clinical and radiographic examination (Fig. 2). Clinical observations included minimal pain and good stability on palpation. Removal of metalwork was necessary in one case for chronic infection presenting as a discharging sinus 2 years following implantation. Removal was not difficult. The anchoring steel wires were cut and removed. The edge of the mesh was grasped in sternal wire needle holder and the mesh was peeled off the underlying bone without any difficulty. The underlying bone was stable and appeared strong. The other two patients remain clinically well at 28 and 47 months post-implantation, respectively.



View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Titanium mesh in-situ as seen on a lateral chest radiograph.

 

    3. Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Surgical technique
 3. Discussion
 References
 
Titanium mesh has been used extensively in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery with excellent long-term results [11,12]. The mesh provides a scaffold for bony union due to its ideal physical and biomechanical properties. Very low susceptibility to infection has been shown [12]. By maintaining bony stability of the anterior chest wall, functional thoracic movement is preserved and any paradoxical respiration avoided. Physical and psychological support must be part of the post-operative management.

Sternal reconstruction is a standard practice following sternectomy for malignant processes [13]. Polypropylene mesh along with various types of internal fixation such as stainless steel or titanium plates have been widely used [14].

The sternum and adjoining ribs are effective sites of haempoiesis in adulthood. The proliferation of marrow stromal cells within the vicinity of the wound in combination with the mesh acting as a scaffold leads to the ‘regeneration’ of the sternum [15]. It is our belief that the development of absorbable mesh material with similar physical characteristics will facilitate possible redo cardiac surgical procedures.

Our technique of sternal reconstruction using an appropriate titanium wire mesh is simple and safe. It can be used even in the presence of chronic infection and avoids extensive plastic reconstructive surgery.

We must add that there was no pre-operative selection of our three cases. In all patients the decision was taken on the operating table as soon as it was realized that insufficient bony fragments ruled out conventional reconstruction. This was not a clinical trial or randomized study. Hence ethics committee approval was not taken. We have not had any further case since May 2002. It is not possible to randomize such a rare event. We do not intend to do a prospective study given such low occurrence of this problem in our experience. No conflict of interest exists.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Surgical technique
 3. Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stahle E, Tammelin A, Bergstrom R, Hambreus A, Nystrom SO, Hansson HE. Sternal wound complications—incidence, microbiology and risk factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:1146–53.[Abstract]
  2. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Disruption and infection of median sternotomy: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;21:831–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lust RM, Sun YS, Chitwood WR Jr. Internal mammary artery use. Sternal revascularization and experimental infection patterns. Circulation 1991;84:III285–89.
  4. Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Pelate C, Marshall WG Jr. Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:210–217.[Abstract]
  5. Robicsek F, Daugherty HK, Cook JW. The prevention and treatment of sternum separation following open-heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977;73:267–8.[Abstract]
  6. Tavilla G, van Son JA, Verhagen AF, Lacquet LK. Modified Robicsek technique for complicated sternal closure. Ann Thorac Surg 1991;52:1179–80.[Abstract]
  7. Sharma R, Puri D, Panigrahi BP, Virdi IS. A modified parasternal wire technique for prevention and treatment of sternal dehiscence. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:210–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Astudillo R, Vaage J, Myhre U, Karevold A, Gardlund B. Fewer reoperations and shorter stay in the cardiac surgical ward when stabilising the sternum with the Ley prosthesis in post-operative mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;20:133–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, Jeevanandam V, Raman J. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:367–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Klesius AA, Dzemali O, Simon A, Kleine P, Abdel-Rahman U, Herzog C, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Moritz A. Successful treatment of deep sternal infections following open heart surgery by bilateral pectoralis major flaps. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25:218–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, Lapp MA, Lenke LG, Riew KD. Analysis of titanium mesh cages in adults with minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2000;25:2407–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kuttenberger JJ and Hardt N. Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micro-mesh systems. J Cranio-maxillofac Surg 2001;29:75–81.[Medline]
  13. Briccoli A, Manfrini M, Rocca M, Lari S, Giacomini S, Mercuri M. Sternal reconstruction with synthetic mesh and metallic plates for high grade tumours of the chest wall. Eur J Surg 2002;168:494–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Chase CW, Franklin JD, Guest DP, Barker DE. Internal fixation of the sternum in median sternotomy dehiscence. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;103:1667–73.[Medline]
  15. Arinzeh TL, Peter SJ, Archambault MP, vandenBos C, Gordon S, Kraus K, Smith A, Kadiyala S. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells regenerate bone in a critical-sized canine segmental defect. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:1927–35.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ioannis Dimarakis
Dilip Oswal
Unnikrishnan R. Nair
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dimarakis, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nair, U. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dimarakis, I.
Right arrow Articles by Nair, U. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS