ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on June 10, 2009, doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.207621

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009;9:406.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Petermann, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, J. O.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Petermann, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prior, J. O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest wall

Thoracic oncologic

Value of positron emission tomography in full-thickness chest wall resections for malignancies

David A. Petermann 1*, Gilles Allenbach 1, Sabine Schmidt 1, Igor Letovanec 1, Michel Christodoulou 1, Angelika Bischof Delaloye 1, Hans-Beat Ris 1, John O. Prior 1

1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.petermann{at}bluewin.ch.


   Abstract
Preoperative imaging for resection of chest wall malignancies is generally performed by computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in planning full-thickness chest wall resections for malignancies. We retrospectively included 18 consecutive patients operated from 2004 to 2006 at our institution. Tumor extent was measured by CT and PET, using the two largest perpendicular tumor extensions in the chest wall plane to compute the tumor surface assuming an elliptical shape. Imaging measurements were compared to histopathology assessment of tumor borders. CT assessment consistently overestimated the tumor size as compared to PET (+64% vs. +1%, P<0.001). Moreover, PET was significantly better than CT at defining the size of lesions >24 cm2 corresponding to a mean diameter >5.5 cm or an ellipse of >4 cmx7.6 cm (positive predictive value 80% vs. 44% and specificity 93% vs. 64%, respectively). Metabolic PET imaging was superior to CT for defining the extent of chest wall tumors, particularly for tumors with a diameter >5.5 cm. PET can complement CT in planning full-thickness chest wall resection for malignancies, but its true value remains to be determined in larger, prospective studies. Keywords: Chest wall; Positron emission tomography; Computed tomography; Cancer





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery