ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on May 15, 2009, doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.206193

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009;9:236.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abe, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Cardiac general

A pilot randomized study of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor, sivelestat, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Tomonobu Abe 1*, Akihiko Usui 2, Hideki Oshima 2, Toshiaki Akita 3, Yuichi Ueda 2

1 Nagoya First Red Cross Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
2 Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
3 Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tomonobu_abe{at}hotmail.com.


   Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of treatment with Sivelestat in humans to attenuate post-cardiopulmonary bypass lung injury. Twenty patients scheduled to undergo on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized to receive either 0.3 mg/kg/h intravenous Sivelestat sodium (Sivelestat group; n=10) or isotonic sodium chloride solution (placebo group, n=10), peri-operatively. Postoperative adverse events were recorded until hospital discharge. The alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-aDO2), intrapulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) and dynamic lung compliance were determined four times peri-operatively as secondary exploratory outcomes. All patients completed study protocol without discontinuation of intervention. The number of total adverse clinical outcomes, including atrial fibrillation and superficial wound infection, was nine in seven patients in the placebo group and four in four patients in the Sivelestat group (P=0.37). The mean duration of the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the Sivelestat group (19.0±3.4 vs. 25.6±9.1, P=0.04). The exploratory analysis of relative changes in lung functions showed trends toward attenuation of lung injury in the Sivelestat group in all three pulmonary parameters, though the inter-group difference could be due to chance (P>0.05). It is feasible to administer Sivelestat as a preventive measure against lung dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass. Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass; Inflammatory response; Coronary artery bypass grafts; Pulmonary function; Peri-operative care





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery