ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on August 12, 2008
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.182246
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Segesser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tozzi, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Segesser, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tozzi, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Mechanical Circulatory Assistance
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Cardiopulmonary bypass

Temporary caval stenting improves venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass

Ludwig von Segesser 1*, Giuseppe Siniscalchi 1, Kwang Kang 1, Olaf Mauntz 1, Judith Horisberger 1, Enrico Ferrari 1, Dominique Delay 1, Piergiorgio Tozzi 1

1 CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: editor{at}ejcts.ch.


   Abstract
Objectives: Assess the benefit of temporary caval stenting for remote venous drainage during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods: Temporary caval stenting was realized in bovine experiments (65±6 kg) by the means of self-expanding (18F for insertion, 36F in situ) venous cannulas (Smartcanula LLC, Lausanne, Switzerland) with various lengths: 43 cm, 53 cm, 63 cm versus a standard 28F wire armed cannula in trans-jugular fashion. Maximal blood flows were assessed for 20, 25 and 30 mmHg of driving pressure with a motorized table height adjustment system. In addition the inferior caval diameters (just above its bifurcation) were measured in real time with intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS). Results: Venous drainage (flow in l/min) at 20 mmHg, 25 mmHg, and 30 mmHg drainage load was 3.5±0.5, 3.7±0.7, and 4.0±0.6 for the 28F standard versus 4.1±0.7, 4.0±1.3, and 3.9±1.1 for the 36F smart 43 cm, versus 5.0±0.7, 5.3±1.3, and 5.4±1.4 for the 36F smart 53 cm, versus 5.2±0.5*, 5.6±1.1*, and 5.8±1.0* for the 36F smart 63 cm. The inferior vena caval diameters at 30 mmHg were 13.5±4.8 mm for 28F standard, 11.1±3.6 36F smart 43 cm, 11.3±3.2 for 36F 53 cm, and 17.0±0.1* for 36F 63 cm (*p<0.05 for 28F standard versus 36F smart 63 cm long). Conclusions: The 43 cm self-expanding 36F smartcanula® outperforms the 28F standard wire armed cannula at low drainage pressures and without augmentation. Temporary caval stenting with long self-expanding venous cannulas provides even better drainage (+51%). Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass; Venous drainage; Venous cannula; Cannulation; Pump oxygenator; Stent





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery