ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on July 31, 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.181438
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knapik, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zembala, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knapik, P.
Right arrow Articles by Zembala, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation

Cardiac general

Retrospective cross-validation of simplified predictive index for renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery

Piotr Knapik 1*, Piotr Rozentryt 1, Pawel Nadziakiewicz 1, Lech Polonski 1, Marian Zembala 1

1 Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pknapik{at}slam.katowice.pl.


   Abstract
Objectives: Acute kidney impairment requiring renal replacement therapy is an infrequent but dangerous complication of cardiac surgery. Its development is associated with high mortality and morbidity. A recently published simple risk stratification engine has been developed and validated in USA and Canada, but its discriminatory power has never been tested in Europe. We aimed to cross-validate the newly developed risk stratification algorithm in a group of patients operated on in a single centre in Poland. Methods: From electronic database we selected 1421 patients fulfilling identical inclusion and exclusion criteria as in derivation cohort in Canada. In each patient eligible for analysis we calculated simplified renal index and assessed its predictive power for the need of renal replacement therapy. Results: After surgery 33 (2.3%) patients developed acute kidney impairment and subsequently underwent renal replacement therapy. The simplified renal index predicted risk of postoperative renal replacement therapy in our group. Patients with low values of simplified renal index (0-1), medium (2-3) and high values (4 and more) were found to have increasingly higher risk for renal replacement therapy of 1.1% (95% CI: 0.5-2.1%), 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9-5%) and 12.5% (95% CI: 5.2-24.1%), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of simplified renal index as predictor of renal replacement therapy in our centre was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62-0.81) and did not differ significantly from the values obtained in the original paper. Conclusion: The new risk stratification algorithm is effective in discrimination of patients at high risk for development of acute kidney impairment with the need of renal replacement therapy. Keywords: Acute kidney impairment; Cardiac surgery; Renal replacement; Risk stratification; Validation





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery