ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on June 11, 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.181057

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008;7:745.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maruyama, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Myocardial protection
Right arrowRelated Article

Experimental

Myocardial protection: efficacy of a novel magnesium-based cardioplegia (RS-C) compared to St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution

Yuji Maruyama 1 David J. Chambers 1*

1 St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.chambers{at}kcl.ac.uk.


   Abstract
Cardiac surgery patients now tend to be sicker with more severe disease; consequently, improved protection is important. We compared St Thomas' Hospital solution (STH2: hyperkalaemia and hypermagnesaemia) to a hypermagnesaemia-alone cardioplegia (RS-C) based on a novel non-phosphate buffered crystalloid solution (Aqix®RS-I). Isolated Langendorff-perfused rat hearts were used (function measured). Initial studies established optimal magnesium concentration as 25 mM (LVDP recovery after 50 min at 37 °C global ischaemia (GI) for 16, 25, 35, 50 mM magnesium versus STH2 was 48±3, 50±2, 50±3, 30±3 and 51±2% respectively). Contracture-related measurements (onset time, peak) for 25 mM RS-C (32±1 min, 35±1 mmHg) compared favourable (p<0.05) to STH2 (26±1 min, 43±2 mmHg). LVDP recovery after single 2 min cardioplegic infusion (with RS-C-25 or STH2) and 20, 30, 40 or 50 min GI was higher for RS-C-25 than STH2 after 20 min GI (81±1% vs 74±1%; [p<0.05]) but similar at other GI durations. Subsequent multi-infusion studies (60 min GI, 3x2 min infusions every 20 min) demonstrated significantly improved recovery with RS-C-25 versus STH2 (LVDP: 73±2%, 44±1% [p<0.001]; LVEDP: 9±2 mmHg, 45±2 mmHg [p<0.001]). We conclude that single RS-C infusion with optimal 25 mM magnesium improved protection after short (20 min) GI durations, or after multi-infusions during prolonged (60 min) GI durations. Magnesium-based cardioplegia may be a useful alternative to hyperkalaemic cardioplegia under certain specific conditions. Keywords: Myocardial protection; Cardioplegia; Magnesium

Related Article

eComment: Myocardial protection: efficacy of a novel magnesium-basedcardioplegia (RS-C) compared to St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution
Leo A. Bockeria, Ruben R. Movsesyan, Dmitriy V. Ryabtsev, and Tigran R. Grigoryants
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 749. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
L. A. Bockeria, R. R. Movsesyan, D. V. Ryabtsev, and T. R. Grigoryants
eComment: Myocardial protection: efficacy of a novel magnesium-basedcardioplegia (RS-C) compared to St Thomas' Hospital cardioplegic solution
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 749 - 749.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery