ICVTS Click here to go to Siemens website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on July 31, 2008
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.178749
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow eComments: Submit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balsara, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Welsby, I. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balsara, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Welsby, I. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Lung - transplantation
Right arrow Cardiac - pharmacology

Transplantation

Aprotinin's effect on blood product transfusion in off-pump bilateral lung transplantation

Keki R. Balsara 1*, Steven T. Morozowich 1, Shu S. Lin 1, Robert D. Davis 1, Barbara G. Phillips-Bute 1, Matthew G. Hartwig 1, James Z. Appel 1, Ian J. Welsby 1

1 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: balsa001{at}mc.duke.edu.


   Abstract
In lung transplants necessitating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), aprotinin has been shown to decrease transfusion requirements. More recently, off-pump transplantation has become the standard of care. The efficacy of aprotinin use in this population has yet to be definitively examined. We completed a retrospective review of all adult OP-BOLTs performed between January 2000 and January 2006 at a single university center (n=215). Aprotinin use was determined by the attending anesthesiologist or surgeon. It was administered at the time of induction. The primary outcome was total blood products utilized in terms of units transfused during post-operative days 0, 1 and 2. One-hundred and one patients received aprotinin and 114 did not. An overall analysis of all of the patients in this study demonstrated a trend towards statistical significance for reduced total blood product transfusion for the aprotinin group compared to the non-aprotinin group (p=0.13). A subgroup analysis was performed in relation to each diagnosis. The use of aprotinin was associated with a significant reduction in peri-operative total blood products transfused in COPD patients (p=0.03) undergoing OP-BOLT. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the use of aprotinin in the COPD population did result in a statistically significant decrease in total blood products transfused, specifically the total number of units of packed red blood cells given. These findings suggest that aprotinin administration should be considered for all patients undergoing OP-BOLT to reduce exposure to blood products and potential immune sensitization and infectious complications. Keywords: Blood loss; Lung transplantation; Postoperative complications; Aprotinin adverse effects; Blood transfusion





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery