ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on May 9, 2008
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.172569
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow eComments: Submit
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kohonen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kohonen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tarkka, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - physiology
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Peripheral vascular

Coronary

Non-harvestable radial artery. A bilateral problem?

Mika Kohonen 1*, Ossi Teerenhovi 1, Tiina Terho 1, Jari Laurikka 1, Matti Tarkka 1

1 Tampere University Hospital, Finland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mika.kohonen{at}pshp.fi.


   Abstract
Since radial artery is preferably harvested from a non-dominant hand, our aim was to study whether there are contraindications for radial artery harvest in the dominant hand if the radial artery of the other hand is not suitable for harvesting. Thirty-three patients scheduled to coronary artery bypass grafting with contraindication for radial artery harvest in the non-dominant hand underwent Allen test, upper arm Doppler ultrasonography and digital pletysmography. In ultrasonography both anatomical and circulatory measurements were performed. Both hands were then compared to each other. Furthermore twelve control patients without contraindication for radial artery harvest in the non-dominant hand were examined. All thirty-three patients had contraindication for radial artery harvest in the non-dominant hand. Twenty-four (73%) had contraindication in the dominant hand as well. In terms of morphology, there was no statistically significant difference between the hands but circulatory parameters as a group suggested contraindication. Among controls, four patients (33%) had contraindication in the dominant hand. In the case of a non-harvestable radial artery in a hand there is clearly an increased risk for contraindication for radial artery harvest also in the other hand. Keywords: Radial artery; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Ultrasonography





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery