ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published on February 13, 2008
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008, doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.171678
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Journal Format PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eComments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noyez, L.
Right arrow Articles by van Swieten, H. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noyez, L.
Right arrow Articles by van Swieten, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional affairs
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Valve disease

Cardiac general

The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery

Luc Noyez 1*, Freek W.A. Verheugt 1, Henry A. van Swieten 1

1 Nijmegen University Hospital St. Radboud, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: l.noyez{at}thorax.umcn.nl.


   Abstract
Objective: Does a structured follow-up, after cardiac surgery in an adult, provide additional information on the operation related mortality certainly if mortality is used as an outcome parameter within the quality control? Method: Mortality data of 1132 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2003 and 2004 in the Academic Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands were registered by a structured follow-up one year after surgery. Results: One year after surgery this follow-up is missing information of 8 patients (0.7%). Six patients (0.5%) refused further follow-up. Of the 31 patients who died during the first postoperative year 21 (68%) were registered thanks to this structured follow-up. In 29 patients it was possible to retrieve the cause of death. Conclusion: A structured follow-up one year after cardiac surgery has a high response and not only provides a better total picture of mortality, but also information on the cause of death. Both aspects are important if mortality is used as a parameter for quality control in cardiac surgery. Keywords: Mortality; Cardiac surgery; Follow-up; Quality control





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery