This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Hauw T. Sie Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Beukema, R. Articles by Elvan, A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beukema, R. Articles by Elvan, A. Related Collections Related Article

Monitoring of atrial fibrillation burden after surgical ablation: relevancy of end-point criteria after radiofrequency ablation treatment of patients with lone atrial fibrillation

Departments of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, The Netherlands

*Corresponding author. Department of Cardiology, Isala Klinieken, Groot Wezenland 20, 8011 JW Zwolle, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 38 4242374; fax: +31 38 4243222.

E-mail address: v.r.c.derks{at}isala.nl (A. Elvan).

Studies have shown that continuous rhythm monitoring enables the detection of significantly more atrial fibrillation (AF) episodes than routine follow-up of patients, i.e. based on perception of symptoms or on 24–48 h Holter monitoring. The positive outcome of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be easily overestimated, especially in patients with paroxysmal AF. Thirty-three consecutive patients, aged 59.4±8.9 years (range 38–75 years) participated in this study. All patients had documented AF episodes with an AF duration of 9.4±7.1 years (range 1.5–25 years). A new monitoring device, the AF-Alarm was used to more accurately assess the outcome after surgical isolation of pulmonary veins. The AF-Alarm was applied for a duration of 128±42.5 h (range 49–191 h) during a period of 8–15 days. The success rate was 87% based on serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) and 24–48 h Holter monitoring during regular outpatient visits. Combination of ECG, Holter and AF-Alarm data yielded a significantly lower success rate, i.e. at the latest follow-up 69% of the patients were free from AF after surgical ablation (P<0.05). Furthermore, the AF-Alarm device demonstrated a dissociation between symptoms and atrial arrhythmic events and confirmed the occurrence of asymptomatic AF episodes. The most important limitation of the AF-Alarm device was noise detection with oversensing and inappropriate detection of non-existing AF episodes in 9% of patients. Long-term follow-up of the patients seems to be essential as success rates of the initial ablation procedure might vary over time. External recorders like the AF-Alarm may be used as an additional tool to document symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial arrhythmias in the outpatient setting.

Key Words: Atrial fibrillation; RF ablation; Monitoring device

Related Article

eComment: Monitoring of atrial fibrillation burden after surgical ablation

Leo Bockeria, Amiran Sh. Revishvili, and Tamara R. Dzhordzhikiya
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009 9: 959-960. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Bockeria, A. Sh. Revishvili, and T. R. Dzhordzhikiya eComment: Monitoring of atrial fibrillation burden after surgical ablation Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2009; 9(6): 959 - 960. [Full Text] [PDF]