ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:693-697. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.213405
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gill, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gill, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Best evidence topic - Aortic and aneurysmal

Is reduction aortoplasty (with or without external wrap) an acceptable alternative to replacement of the dilated ascending aorta?

Michael Gill* and Joel Dunning

Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel./Fax: +44 191 3862526.

E-mail address: m.gill{at}nhs.net (M. Gill).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether reduction aortoplasty is an acceptable alternative to ascending aorta replacement. From 925 potential papers, 13 papers represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that aortoplasty seems to be a safe procedure which gives good postoperative outcomes in selected patients. Our literature review documents 716 patients from 13 papers, with only 25 patients that on follow-up suffered redilatation (3%). Thus, reduction aortoplasty is a viable alternative to conventional aortic root replacement or interposition tube grafting in some patients. In particular, an aortoplasty in elderly patients with post-stenotic dilatation, or in patients with significant co-morbidities is attractive. It should be acknowledged that only one study directly compares the technique with conventional replacement and that replacement remains the ‘gold standard’ technique. It should also be acknowledged that the external wrap is not without risk and wrap dislocation, erosion or fistula formation are recognised complications.

Key Words: Ascending aorta; Aneurysm; Aortoplasty


Related Article

eComment: Re: Is reduction aortoplasty (with or without external wrap) an acceptable alternative to replacement of the dilated ascending aorta?
Leo A. Bockeria, Ivan I. Skopin, Vladimir A. Mironenko, and Garik G. Aleksanyan
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009 9: 697. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICVTSHome page
L. A. Bockeria, I. I. Skopin, V. A. Mironenko, and G. G. Aleksanyan
eComment: Re: Is reduction aortoplasty (with or without external wrap) an acceptable alternative to replacement of the dilated ascending aorta?
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2009; 9(4): 697 - 697.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery