ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:618-622. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.210310
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ryoichi Nakanishi
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Odate, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakanishi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Odate, S.

Institutional report - Thoracic oncologic

Video-assisted thoracic surgery major pulmonary resection requiring control of the main pulmonary artery

Ryoichi Nakanishi*, Soichi Oka and Seiichi Odate

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shin-Kokura Hospital, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations, 1-3-1 Kanada, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyusyu 803-8505, Japan

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-93-571-1031; fax: +81-93-591-0553.

E-mail address: ryoichi{at}med.uoeh-u.ac.jp (R. Nakanishi).

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection requiring the cross-clamping of the main pulmonary artery (PA), in comparison to an open thoracotomy performed in patients with lung cancer. A retrospective database of 27 consecutive lung cancer patients, who underwent either video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (n=13) or open thoracotomy (n=14) for a major pulmonary resection using these procedures, was analyzed regarding the demographic, perioperative, histopathologic, and outcome variables. The thoracoscopic procedures were successfully performed in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). Two groups showed no differences in the demographic, perioperative, histopathologic and staging variables. Both groups presented with no mortality. The VATS group showed better results regarding the length of epidural anesthesia (P=0.0066), additional analgesic requirements (P=0.0009), and morbidity (P=0.0213) than the open thoracotomy group. Despite the short follow-up time, the two groups were comparable regarding both the recurrence and survival rates. The results indicate that VATS is feasible and safe for selected lung cancer patients requiring the cross-clamping of the main PA, with acceptable perioperative results in comparison to an open thoracotomy.

Key Words: Lung cancer; Pulmonary artery; Complications; Lobectomy; Pneumonectomy; Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery