ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:463-466. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.201178
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Themistokles Chamogeorgakis
Ioannis Toumpoulis
Periclis Tomos
Dimitrios Angouras
Emmanouil Georgiannakis
Chris Rokkas
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chamogeorgakis, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rokkas, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chamogeorgakis, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rokkas, C.

Institutional report - Thoracic non-oncologic

External validation of the modified Thoracoscore in a new thoracic surgery program: prediction of in-hospital mortality

Themistokles Chamogeorgakis*, Ioannis Toumpoulis, Periclis Tomos, Costas Ieromonachos, Dimitrios Angouras, Emmanouil Georgiannakis, Panagiotis Michail and Chris Rokkas

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, ‘Attikon’ Hospital, Sofokleous 36, Voula 16673, Athens, Greece

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +302105832150.

E-mail address: themis65{at}hotmail.com (T. Chamogeorgakis).

Informed consent prior to any surgical intervention should include in-hospital survival estimation after the procedure performed. The recently developed Thoracoscore predicts well the postoperative mortality possibility. The purpose of our study was to test the modified Thoracoscore performance in our new thoracic program. One hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients underwent thoracic surgery procedure within two years. The procedures performed were: 62 lung resections, 10 open tumor biopsies, 21 neck and mediastinal procedures, 33 chest wall and pleural procedures, 8 tracheal procedures, 3 esophageal procedures, 13 minor cardiac procedures, and 5 chest trauma cases. The modified Thoracoscore was calculated based on the following variables: age, gender, priority of the procedure, malignancy, type of procedure, Zubrod score, ASA class, and number of co-morbidities. The observed mortality was 5.2% (eight deaths) while the predicted one based on the modified Thoracoscore was 4.9%. The scoring system we used had excellent discriminatory ability with a C statistic (0.95, 95% CIs 0.91–0.99). The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit was not statistically significant (P=0.82), indicating acceptable calibration of the model for the present series. The modified Thoracoscore's ability to predict postoperative survival in the whole context of thoracic surgery performs well in our program. Application of any risk scoring system requires external validation and provides comparison of the actual outcomes with other programs.

Key Words: In-hospital mortality; Thoracic surgery; Risk prediction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery