ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:323-326. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.206177
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Salvatore Giordano
Fausto Biancari
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Biancari, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giordano, S.
Right arrow Articles by Biancari, F.

Best evidence topic - Valves

Does the use of carbon dioxide field flooding during heart valve surgery prevent postoperative cerebrovascular complications?

Salvatore Giordanoa,* and Fausto Biancarib

a Department of Surgery, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130, Vaasa, Finland
b Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 443346119; fax: +358 6323152.

E-mail address: salvatoregiordano{at}yahoo.it (S. Giordano).

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is any benefit with the use of carbon dioxide (CO2) field flooding techniques in heart valve surgery, in order to reduce postoperative neurological complications. Altogether 202 articles were found using the reported search, and six of them were used to answer the clinical question. All but one trial, were prospective, randomised. Four studies reported a significantly lower intracardiac bubble count in the CO2 group. A significant reduction of p300 peak latencies in the CO2 group was observed in one study. Otherwise, neurocognitive test batteries did not reveal any advantages of CO2 field flooding in two studies. Three studies reported on postoperative cerebrovascular complications and the overall rate of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or prolonged reversible ischemic neurological deficit was 1.2% in the CO2 group and 2.5% in the control group (P=ns). Although the use of CO2 field flooding has been observed to be associated with a significantly lower count of intracardiac air bubbles, and improved survival in two small studies, so far there is no evidence of a sustained reduction of cerebrovascular complications with the use of this method.

Key Words: Evidence-based medicine; Heart valve surgery; Carbon dioxide field flooding; Air embolisation; Stroke







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery