This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Alessandro Castiglioni Alessandro Verzini Simona Nascimbene Ottavio Alfieri Permission Requests Google Scholar Articles by Castiglioni, A. Articles by Alfieri, O. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Castiglioni, A. Articles by Alfieri, O.

Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement: a randomized study

Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 02 26437102; fax: +39 02 26437125.

E-mail address: Verzini.Alessandro{at}hsr.it (A. Verzini).

To evaluate the clinical results of aortic valve replacement performed with a miniaturized closed circuit extracorporeal circulation (MECC) system and to compare it to standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). One hundred and twenty consecutive patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement were randomly assigned to either a miniaturized closed circuit CPB with the maquet-cardiopulmonary MECC System© (study group, n=60) or to a standard CPB (control group, n=60). Demographic characteristic and operative data were similar in the two groups. No hospital death occurred in either group and no difference in intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital stay was observed. Patients in the study group showed lower chest tube drainage (212±62 ml vs. 420±219 ml, P<0.05) and lower need for blood products (6.1% vs. 40.4%, P<0.05) than patients in the control group. Platelet count at ICU arrival was significantly higher in the study group (139±40x10 ⁹/l vs. 164±75x10 ⁹/l, P=0.05). Peak postoperative troponin I release was significantly lower in the MECC group (3.81±2.7 ng/dl vs. 6.6±6.8 ng/dl, P<0.05). In this randomized study the MECC system has demonstrated best postoperative clinical results in terms of need for transfusion, platelets consumption and myocardial damage as compared to standard CPB.

Key Words: Aortic valve replacement; Minimally invasive; Extracorporeal circulation