ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2009;9:15-19. doi:10.1510/icvts.2008.195347
© 2009 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Sridhar Rathinam
Richard Steyn
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rathinam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Raghuraman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rathinam, S.
Right arrow Articles by Raghuraman, G.

Institutional report - Experimental

A randomised controlled trial comparing Mediwrap® heat retention and forced air warming for maintaining normothermia in thoracic surgery{star}

Sridhar Rathinama, Venkatesh Annamb, Richard Steyna and Govindan Raghuramanb,*

a Regional Department of Thoracic Surgery, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK
b Academic Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 121 4243438; fax: +44 121 4240562.

E-mail address: govindan.raghuraman{at}heartofengland.nhs.uk (G. Raghuraman).

Hypothermia is one of the common complications in the perioperative period. Currently, normothermia is maintained with forced air warming (FAW) or passive heat retention methods. We compared the efficacy of the Mediwrap® blanket with FAW in maintaining normothermia during intra-operative period in thoracic surgery in a prospective randomised controlled trial on 30 patients. Core temperature was measured at 30-min intervals in the perioperative period and the time taken to attain baseline in the postoperative periods in the two groups was compared. There was no difference in core temperatures between the groups during pre- and intra-operative period, with mean±S.D. final core temperatures of 36.2±0.6 °C with Mediwrap® and 36±0.9 °C with the FAW blanket. However, the postoperative core temperatures were significantly higher in the Mediwrap® group. The time required to reach baseline temperature was lower in the Mediwrap® group with a mean±S.D. of 66±66 min as compared to 161±108 min in the FAW group. The Mediwrap® blanket is as effective as the FAW blanket in maintaining core body temperature during thoracotomy when applied thirty minutes before the surgery.

Key Words: Hypothermia; Thoracic surgery; Warming devices; Forced air warming; Mediwrap®







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2009 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery