This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Peteris Stradins Romans Lacis Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kalejs, M. Articles by Kasyanov, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kalejs, M. Articles by Kasyanov, V. Related Collections Related Article

St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves – comparison of mechanical properties ^,

^a Center of Cardiac Surgery, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, 13 Pilsonu Street, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
^b Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Street, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +371 67069221; fax: +371 67069421.

E-mail address: martins.kalejs{at}stradini.lv (M. Kalejs).

Objectives: The major problem with heart valve bioprostheses made from chemically treated porcine aortic valves is their limited longevity caused by gradual deterioration, which has a causal link with valve tissue mechanical properties. To our best knowledge, there are no published studies on the mechanical properties of modern, commercially available bioprostheses comparing them to native human valves. The objective of this study is to determine the mechanical properties of St Jude Epic bioprostheses and to compare them with native human and porcine aortic valves. Methods: Leaflets from eight porcine aortic valves and six Epic bioprostheses were analyzed using uni-axial tensile tests in radial and circumferential directions. Mechanical properties of human valves have been previously published by our group. Results are represented as mean values±S.D. Results: Circumferential direction. Modulus of elasticity of Epic bioprostheses in circumferential direction at the level of stress 1.0 MPa is 101.99±58.24 MPa, 42.3±4.96 MPa for native porcine and 15.34±3.84 MPa for human aortic valves. Ultimate stress is highest for Epic bioprostheses 5.77±1.94 MPa, human valves have ultimate stress of 1.74±0.29 MPa and porcine 1.58±0.26 MPa. Ultimate strain in circumferential direction is highest for human valves 18.35±7.61% followed by 7.26±0.69% for porcine valves and 5.95±1.54% for Epic bioprostheses. Radial direction. Modulus of elasticity in radial direction is 9.18±1.81 MPa for Epic bioprostheses, 5.33±0.61 MPa for native porcine, and 1.98±0.15 MPa for human aortic valve leaflets. In the radial direction ultimate stress is highest for Epic bioprostheses 0.7±0.21 MPa followed by native porcine valves 0.55±0.11 MPa and 0.32±0.04 MPa for human valves. For human valves ultimate strain is 23.92±4.87%, for native porcine valves 8.57±0.8% and 7.92±1.74% for Epic bioprostheses. Conclusions: Epic bioprostheses have non-linear stress–strain behavior similar to native valve tissue, but they are significantly stiffer and hence less elastic compared to native porcine and human aortic valves. These differences in mechanical properties may cause variations in stress distribution within leaflets of the bioprosthetic valves and accelerate their deterioration.

Key Words: Aortic valve; Mechanical properties; Bioprosthesis

Related Article

eComment: CorBeat trileaflet mechanical full-flow heart valve prosthesis versus native human aortic valves – evaluation of functional performance

Leo A. Bockeria, Aleksandr Fadeev, Olga Bockeria, and Osman Makhachev
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009 8: 557. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. A. Bockeria, A. Fadeev, O. Bockeria, and O. Makhachev eComment: CorBeat trileaflet mechanical full-flow heart valve prosthesis versus native human aortic valves - evaluation of functional performance Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, May 1, 2009; 8(5): 557 - 557. [Full Text] [PDF]