This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Joel Dunning Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Adam, Z. Articles by Dunning, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Adam, Z. Articles by Dunning, J. Related Collections Related Article

Could we use abdominal compressions rather than chest compression in patients who arrest after cardiac surgery?

^a Department of Cardiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
^b Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 164 2282410; fax: +44 164 2282887.

E-mail address: adamz{at}doctors.org.uk (Z. Adam).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether abdominal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) could be used instead of external cardiac massage either to protect the recent sternotomy or while chest compressions are not possible whilst a sternotomy is being performed. Altogether 386 papers were found using the reported search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Patients who arrest after cardiac surgery and require chest reopening will have a period of no external chest compression and therefore, no cerebral or coronary perfusion. In addition, if a patient arrests prior to cardiac surgery there will be a period of time performing the sternotomy during which there will be no external compressions. We found only one paper in a porcine model that looked at the effectiveness of abdominal only CPR although it did show that abdominal CPR was actually 60% better than chest CPR. Interposed abdominal and chest compressions has been much more extensively studied and has been shown to be significantly better in return of spontaneous circulation than chest compressions alone. We conclude that currently there is very little evidence to support abdominal only CPR although these studies may support the concept that it may potentially increase the coronary and cerebral perfusion pressure.

Key Words: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Abdominal compression

Related Article

eComment: Questioning a ‘best evidence’ search arguing against abdominal-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and for external cardiac massage

Eric M. Rottenberg
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2009 8: 151-152. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Rottenberg eComment: Questioning a 'best evidence' search arguing against abdominal-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation and for external cardiac massage Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 151 - 152. [Full Text] [PDF]