This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): David G. Healy Martin Hargrove John Hinchion Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Healy, D. G. Articles by Aherne, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Healy, D. G. Articles by Aherne, T. Related Collections Related Article

Impact of pacing modality and biventricular pacing on cardiac output and coronary conduit flow in the post-cardiotomy patient

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +353-21-4922617; fax: +353-21-4922818.

E-mail address: cardiothoracic{at}gmail.com (D.G. Healy).

We have previously demonstrated the role of univentricular pacing modalities in influencing coronary conduit flow in the immediate post-operative period in the cardiac surgery patient. We wanted to determine the mechanism of this improved coronary conduit and, in addition, to explore the possible benefits with biventricular pacing. Sixteen patients undergoing first time elective coronary artery bypass grafting who required pacing following surgery were recruited. Comparison of cardiac output and coronary conduit flow was performed between VVI and DDD pacing with a single right ventricular lead and biventricular pacing lead placement. Cardiac output was measured using arterial pulse waveform analysis while conduit flow was measured using ultrasonic transit time methodology. Cardiac output was greatest with DDD pacing using right ventricular lead placement only [DDD-univentricular 5.42 l (0.7), DDD-biventricular 5.33 l (0.8), VVI-univentricular 4.71 l (0.8), VVI-biventricular 4.68 l (0.6)]. DDD-univentricular pacing was significantly better than VVI-univentricular (P=0.023) and VVI-biventricular pacing (P=0.001) but there was no significant advantage to DDD-biventricular pacing (P=0.45). In relation to coronary conduit flow, DDD pacing again had the highest flow [DDD-univentricular 55 ml/min (24), DDD-biventricular 52 ml/min (25), VVI-univentricular 47 ml/min (23), VVI-biventricular 50 ml/min (26)]. DDD-univentricular pacing was significantly better than VVI-univentricular (P=0.006) pacing but not significantly different to VVI-biventricular pacing (P=0.109) or DDD-biventricular pacing (P=0.171). Pacing with a DDD modality offers the optimal coronary conduit flow by maximising cardiac output. Biventricular lead placement offered no significant benefit to coronary conduit flow or cardiac output.

Key Words: Pacing; Biventricular; Cardiac output; Coronary conduit flow; DDD; VVI

Related Article

eComment: Biventricular pacing in cardiac surgery – potential role for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and nt-pro-BNP determination

Karsten Knobloch
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2008 7: 808. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Vaughan, F. Bhatti, S. Hunter, and J. Dunning Does biventricular pacing provide a superior cardiac output compared to univentricular pacing wires after cardiac surgery? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2009; 8(6): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Knobloch eComment: Biventricular pacing in cardiac surgery - potential role for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and nt-pro-BNP determination Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2008; 7(5): 808 - 808. [Full Text] [PDF]