ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:569-572. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.174755
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Rizwan Qureshi
Javed Hayat
Robert Norton
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Qureshi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Qureshi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pleura

Institutional report - Thoracic general

Should surgical pleurectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax be always thoracoscopic?{star}

Rizwan Qureshia,*, Ann Nugenta, Javed Hayatb, Muhammad Qureshic and Robert Nortona

a Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Walsgrave University Hospital Coventry, UK
b Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan
c Department of Medicine, Mayday University Hospital Croydon, London, UK

*Corresponding author. 4 Appletree Close Catherine De Barne, Solihull B91 2TQ, UK. Tel.: +44 (121) 704 9717; fax: +44 (121) 709 0101.

E-mail address: rizwanqureshi2{at}aol.com (R. Qureshi).

Fifty-seven patients were studied over a period of three years to analyse the efficacy of surgical pleurectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Thirty-one and 26 patients underwent open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleurectomy, respectively. VATS was the main modality used for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) (21 vs. 8). However, secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) was mainly managed with open pleurectomy (23 vs. 5). The median operating time was significantly longer in open group (72.4 vs. 55 min; P=0.005). The amount of analgesia required in the first five days was significantly more in open group (108 mg vs. 46.9 mg; P=0.02). Chest drainage was significantly more in open group (1027.1 ml vs. 652.8 ml; P=0.04). However, chest drain duration and hospital stay had no significant difference. VATS emerged as a cost-effective modality (£1770 vs. £3226). The ability to return to work was significantly earlier in VATS group in PSP patients (6 weeks vs. 10 weeks; P=0.007). There were 3 (5.27%) recurrences in VATS group for patients with SSP. This experience suggests that VATS pleurectomy is an appropriate modality for PSP. However, open pleurectomy is a viable alternative to treat SSP.

Key Words: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax; Secondary spontaneous pneumothorax; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; Open (postero-lateral thoracotomy); Parietal pleurectomy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery