ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:500-503. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.174318
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Shahzad G. Raja
C. Saifuddin Kitchlu
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raja, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kitchlu, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raja, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kitchlu, C. S.

Best evidence topic - Coronary

For patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at higher risk of stroke is the single cross-clamp technique of benefit in reducing the incidence of stroke?

Shahzad G. Raja*, Manoraj Navaratnarajah, Naveed Fida and C. Saifuddin Kitchlu

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Harefield Hospital, Hill End Road, Harefield, UB9 6JH, Middlesex, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1895 828665; fax: +44 1895 828666.

E-mail address: drrajashahzad{at}hotmail.com (S.G. Raja).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether, for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at higher risk of stroke, the single cross-clamp (SC) technique is of benefit in reducing the incidence of stroke. Using the reported search 458 papers were identified. Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of which one was a duplicate publication, represented the best evidence on the subject. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study comments and weaknesses were tabulated for these. We conclude that current best available evidence, from six RCTs randomising 490 patients, suggests that there is no benefit of SC technique over multiple cross-clamp (MC) technique in terms of reduction in the incidence of stroke (SC=2/206 vs. MC=7/284; P=ns) although there is some advantage of SC technique in causing less neuropsychological deficits and release of serum S-100 protein, a surrogate marker of cerebral injury.

Key Words: Coronary artery bypass grafting; Stroke; Focal neurologic deficit; Evidence-based medicine







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery