ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:449-451. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.171678
© 2008 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Luc Noyez
Henry A. van Swieten
Right arrow Permission Requests
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noyez, L.
Right arrow Articles by van Swieten, H. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noyez, L.
Right arrow Articles by van Swieten, H. A.

Follow-up papers - Cardiac general

The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery

Luc Noyeza,*, Freek W.A. Verheugtb and Henry A. van Swietena

a Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, 677, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
b Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, 677, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +31-24 3613711; fax: +31-24 3540129.

E-mail address: l.noyez{at}thorax.umcn.nl (L. Noyez).

Objective: Does a structured follow-up, after cardiac surgery in an adult, provide additional information on the operation related mortality especially if mortality is used as an outcome parameter within the quality control? Method: Mortality data of 1132 patients undergoing cardiac surgery in 2003 and 2004 in the Academic Hospital Nijmegen, the Netherlands were registered by a structured follow-up one year after surgery. Results: One year after surgery this follow-up is missing information for eight patients (0.7%). Six patients (0.5%) refused further follow-up. Of the 31 patients who died during the first postoperative year, 21 (68%) were registered thanks to this structured follow-up. In 29 patients it was possible to retrieve the cause of death. Conclusion: A structured follow-up one year after cardiac surgery has a high response and not only provides a better total picture of mortality, but also information on the cause of death. Both aspects are important if mortality is used as a parameter for quality control in cardiac surgery.

Key Words: Mortality; Cardiac surgery; Follow-up; Quality control







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery