This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Joel Dunning Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Richardson, L. Articles by Dunning, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Richardson, L. Articles by Dunning, J. Related Collections Education Cardiac - physiology Electrophysiology - arrhythmias Related Article

What cardioversion protocol for ventricular fibrillation should be followed for patients who arrest shortly post-cardiac surgery?

^a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
^b School of Health, University of Durham, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44-780-1548122.

E-mail address: joeldunning{at}doctors.org.uk (J. Dunning).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was how many cardioversion attempts should be performed for patients who have gone into ventricular fibrillation post-cardiac surgery prior to performing chest reopening. Using the reported search, 1183 papers were identified. Fifteen papers represented the best evidence on the subject. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study comments and weaknesses were tabulated. The quality and level of evidence was assessed using the International Liaison Committee of Resuscitation guideline recommendations. The most recent European Resuscitation Council guidelines suggest single attempts at cardioversion, spaced at 2-min intervals, for all patients going into ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Cardiac surgery presents a unique challenge for these guidelines in that emergency re-sternotomy may provide additional lifesaving interventions once it is deemed that external cardioversion is unlikely to succeed. The 15 papers identified demonstrated that the success of the first attempt at cardioversion for VF/VT was around 78%. The chance of the second shock succeeding was around 35%. The chance of a third shock succeeding was 14%. Very little data were found on the chance of further shocks succeeding. Of note none of these papers were in patients on the intensive care after cardiac surgery. We conclude that, due to the importance of minimising the delay to chest reopening, three shocks should be quickly delivered. If these do not succeed the chance of a 4th shock succeeding is likely to be <10% and, thus, immediate chest reopening should be performed. (This is a Class-IIa recommendation using ILCOR guideline recommendations.)

Key Words: Cardiothoracic surgery; Defibrillation; Automatic external defibrillator; Ventricular fibrillation

Related Article

Cardioversion protocol for ventricular fibrillation: a more differentiated approach

Michael I. Versteegh
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2007 6: 805. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. I. Versteegh Cardioversion protocol for ventricular fibrillation: a more differentiated approach Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 1, 2007; 6(6): 805 - 805. [Full Text] [PDF]