|
|
||||||||
|
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:665-672. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.160051 © 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Is a stentless aortic valve superior to conventional bioprosthetic valves for aortic valve replacement?Department of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +44-7849729149; fax: +44-1224553506. A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether a stentless valve is superior to conventional stented valves when tissue aortic valve replacement is performed. Altogether more than 515 papers were found using the reported search, of which 16 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that stentless valves allow a larger effective orifice area valve to be implanted with a lower mean and peak aortic gradient postoperatively. At six months several studies and a meta-analysis have shown superior left ventricular mass regression in the stentless valve groups. However, by 12 months the stented valve groups catch up in terms of mass regression and this significance disappears. So the eminent speaker from the floor, was right with his statement, that there have been no definitively proven benefits for stentless valves.
Key Words: Stentless valve; Stented valve; Thoracic surgery; Aortic valve replacement
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |