This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nitecki, S. S. Articles by Bass, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nitecki, S. S. Articles by Bass, A. Related Collections Related Articles

Venous trauma in the Lebanon War – 2006

^a Department of Vascular Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, P.O. Box 9602, Haifa 36091, Israel
^b Department of Vascular Surgery, Assaf Harofe, Zrifin, Israel

*Corresponding author. Tel.: 972-4-854-3119; fax: 972-4-854-3498.

E-mail address: s_nitecki{at}rambam.health.gov.il (S.S. Nitecki).

Objectives: Reports on venous trauma are relatively sparse. Severe venous trauma is manifested by hemorrhage, not ischemia. Bleeding may be internal or external and rarely may lead to hypovolemic shock. Repair of major extremity veins has been a subject of controversy and the current teaching is to avoid venous repair in an unstable or multi-trauma patient. The aim of the current paper is to present our recent experience in major venous trauma during the Lebanon conflict, means of diagnosis and treatment in a level I trauma center. Methods: All cases of major venous trauma, either isolated or combined with arterial injury, admitted to the emergency room during the 33-day conflict were reviewed. Results: Out of 511 wounded soldiers and civilians who were admitted to our service over this period, 12 (2.3%) sustained a penetrating venous injury either isolated (5) or combined with arterial injury (7). All injuries were secondary to high velocity penetrating missiles or from multiple pellets stored in long-range missiles. All injuries were accompanied by additional insult to soft tissue, bone and viscera. The mean injury severity score was 15. Severe external bleeding was the presenting symptom in three cases of isolated venous injury (jugular, popliteal and femoral). The diagnosis of a major venous injury was made by a CTA scan in five cases, angiography in one and during surgical exploration in six cases. All injured veins were repaired: three by venous interposition grafts, four by end to end anastomosis, three by lateral suture and two by endovascular techniques. None of the injuries was treated by ligation of a major named vein. Immediate postoperative course was uneventful in all patients and the 30-day follow-up (by clinical assessment and duplex scan) has demonstrated a patent repair with no evidence of thrombosis. Conclusions: Without contradicting the wisdom of ligating major veins in the setup of multi-trauma or an unstable patient, our experience indicates that a routine repair of venous trauma can be safely and effectively performed in young patients. Postoperative course is not compromised and late sequelae of venous interruption may be prevented.

Key Words: Penetrating trauma; Combat injury; Venous trauma; Venous reconstruction; Venous ligation; CTA in trauma

Related Articles

ICVTS on-line discussion A Venous war injuries

Narcis Hudorovic
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 2007 6: 650-651. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Hudorovic ICVTS on-line discussion A Venous war injuries Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2007; 6(5): 650 - 651. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yavuz ICVTS on-line discussion B Traumatic venous injury: ligation or repair? Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2007; 6(5): 651 - 651. [Full Text] [PDF]