Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:614-617. doi:10.1510/icvts.2007.157701 © 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Institutional report - Pulmonary |
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma
Motoki Sakuraba*,
Hideaki Miyamoto,
Shiaki Oh,
Kazu Shiomi,
Satoshi Sonobe,
Nobumasa Takahashi,
Kota Imashimizu and
Yukinori Sakao
Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Hongo 2-1-1 Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-3-3813-3111; fax: +81-3-5800-0281.
E-mail address: m-skrb{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp (M. Sakuraba).
The aim of this study was to evaluate our personal experience with video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and compare survival between this procedure and conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma. Between May 1997 and December 2004, 140 patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma had either VATS lobectomy (VATS group, 84 patients) or standard lobectomy via open thoracotomy (open group, 56 patients) performed in our hospital. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence between the two groups. The overall survival rate five years after surgery was 72% in the open group and 82% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the overall survival rate between the two groups. The disease-free survival rate five years after surgery was 68% in the open group and 80% in the VATS group. There were no significant differences in the disease-free survival rate between the two groups. Five patients in the open group developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. In the VATS group six patients developed distant recurrence, whereas one patient developed regional recurrence. We consider VATS lobectomy to be one of the therapeutic options in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.
Key Words: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; Conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy; Non-small cell lung carcinoma; Lobectomy; Survival
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sawada, E. Komori, and M. Yamashita
Evaluation of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy requiring emergency conversion to thoracotomy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.,
September 1, 2009;
36(3):
487 - 490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Maeda, N. Isowa, H. Onuma, H. Miura, T. Harada, H. Touge, H. Tokuyasu, and Y. Kawasaki
The maximum standardized 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography predicts lymph node metastasis and invasiveness in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery,
July 1, 2009;
9(1):
79 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Tomaszek, S. D. Cassivi, K. R. Shen, M. S. Allen, F. C. Nichols III, C. Deschamps, and D. A. Wigle
Clinical Outcomes of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
June 1, 2009;
84(6):
509 - 513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. D. Yan, D. Black, P. G. Bannon, and B. C. McCaughan
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Trials on Safety and Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
May 20, 2009;
27(15):
2553 - 2562.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|