ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:379-383. doi:10.1510/icvts.2006.145193
© 2007 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Fernando Barreiros
Paulo Pinho
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pinho, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Almeida, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pinho, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Extracorporeal circulation
Right arrow Valve disease

Negative results - Valves

Stuck leaflet of bileaflet prosthesis in mitral position – five cases to make us think

Jorge Almeida*, Albino Santos, Fernando Barreiros, Mota Garcia and Paulo Pinho

Centre of Thoracic Surgery, S.João Hospital, 4202-451, Oporto, Portugal

*Corresponding author. Centro de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital de S.João, 4202-451, Porto, Portugal. Tel.: +351-2-5502417; fax: +351-2-5502254.

E-mail address: jalmeida{at}hsjoao.min-saude.pt (J. Almeida).

Objective: We present five cases of mitral bileaflet prosthesis dysfunction as a result of a stuck leaflet in closed position, diagnosed at surgery or during the first postoperative year. Methods and results: The diagnosis was made by echocardiography and could be confirmed by fluoroscopy in three patients. All cases had in common an early occurrence and the presence of a clean prosthesis by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). In one patient the diagnosis was made by intraoperative TEE, and the problem could be solved by rotation of the occluding device. In the other four patients the diagnosis was made postoperatively and different strategies of treatment were taken. All but one case were reoperations, one had a dysfunctional biological prosthesis and three had been submitted to mitral valvoplasty (two rheumatic and one degenerative valves). According to our policy, patients started sodium warfarin therapy 24 h after surgery in order to keep International normalized ratio (INR) values between 2.5–3.5. Only in one case the presence of thrombus/pannus could be confirmed. Conclusions: We call the attention to causes other than thrombosis that can provoke leaflet block and to the importance of performing intraoperative TEE in patients submitted to mitral valve replacement. We also emphasize the fact that a stuck leaflet in a clean prosthesis can evolve without major symptoms or cardiac events.

Key Words: Prosthesis dysfunction; Stuck leaflet







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery