ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:602-607. doi:10.1510/icvts.2006.129676
© 2006 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Erik Gyllstedt
Ramon Lillo-Gil
Per Jönsson
Tomas Gudbjartsson
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingolfsson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gudbjartsson, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ingolfsson, I.
Right arrow Articles by Gudbjartsson, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other

Negative results - Thoracic general

Reoperations are common following VATS for spontaneous pneumothorax: study of risk factors

Ingimar Ingolfsson, Erik Gyllstedt, Ramon Lillo-Gil, Andreas Pikwer, Per Jönsson and Tomas Gudbjartsson*

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University Hospital, S 222 85, Lund, Sweden

*Corresponding author. Fax: +46 46 158635.

E-mail address: tomasgudbjartsson{at}hotmail.com (T. Gudbjartsson).

Objectives: To identify risk factors for reoperation following surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. Material and methods: This is a retrospective clinical study conducted on 240 consecutive patients operated on for spontaneous pneumothorax in Lund University Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003. Patient information was gained from medical charts and operation reports. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors. Median follow-up was 54 months. Results: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was used in 93% of the patients, where bullectomy with or without pleurodesis/pleurectomy was performed in most cases. Conversion to anterolateral thoracotomy was required in 6 cases (2.3%). Operative mortality (<30 days) was 0.8% (0% after VATS). Altogether 35 patients (13.7%) required a reoperation. Twenty patients were reoperated on within one month from surgery, most often due to prolonged air leakage (n=13, 5.1%) and bleeding (n=6, 2.3%). Fifteen patients (5.8%) were reoperated on because of recurrent pneumothorax, on average 17 months (range 1–39 months) after the primary operation. Significant independent risk factors for reoperation were; young age, operations performed for secondary pneumothorax due to emphysema and recurrent pneumothorax. The risk was also increased in patients where wedge resection was not performed. However, the type of pleurodesis or pleurectomy was not related to increased risk. Conclusions: A considerable number of patients require reoperation after VATS for pneumothorax. Most reoperations are due to prolonged air leakage or recurrent pneumothorax. The risk for reoperation is increased in younger patients, patients operated for recurrent or secondary pneumothorax, and in cases where pulmonary wedge resection is not performed.

Key Words: Pneumothorax; Recurrent pneumothorax; Surgical technique; Reoperations; Risk factors







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery