ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:275-278. doi:10.1510/icvts.2006.130559
© 2006 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrow Education

Best evidence topic - Thoracic general

Should chest drains be put on suction or not following pulmonary lobectomy?

Aliu Sannia, Adam Critchleya and Joel Dunning*,b

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7AZ, UK
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

*Corresponding author: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. Tel./fax: +44-780-1548122.

E-mail address: joeldunning{at}doctors.org.uk (J. Dunning).

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the use of suction applied to chest drains in patients undergoing lobectomy reduces the incidence of prolonged air leak. Altogether 391 papers were found using the reported search, of which 6 represented the best evidence on this topic, including 5 well conducted prospective randomised controlled trials. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude that of the 6 studies presented, no studies found in favour of suction to reduce the incidence of air leak, 2 studies found no difference between the two strategies, and 4 studies found evidence that water seal drainage without suction reduced the incidence of air leak. Five of the 6 studies used a short period of suction in the immediate post-operative period and the one study looking at immediate water seal drainage found no differences in outcome. Exceptions to the water seal strategy may be patients with a large air leak, or a large pneumothorax on CXR.

Key Words: Evidence based medicine; Suction; Chest tubes; Drainage; Lobectomy; Thoracic surgery







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery