This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Alessandro Brunelli Majed Al Refai Michele Salati Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brunelli, A. Articles by Sabbatini, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brunelli, A. Articles by Sabbatini, A. Related Collections Lung - cancer

Risk-adjusted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue models for internal provider profiling after major lung resection

Unit of Thoracic Surgery, ‘Umberto I°’ Regional Hospital, Via S. Margherita 23, Ancona, 60129 Italy

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 071 5964439; fax: +39 071 5964433.

E-mail address: alexit2000{at}yahoo.com (A. Brunelli).

This work was aimed at developing risk-adjusted outcome models for profiling the internal quality of care after major lung resection. One thousand and sixty-two patients submitted to lobectomy (845) or pneumonectomy (217) from 1994 through 2004 at our unit were analyzed. Risk-adjusted models of 30-day or in-hospital morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue (death/complication ratio) were developed by stepwise logistic regression analyses and validated by bootstrap procedures. The regression equations were then used to estimate the outcome risks in 3 successive periods of activity (early: 1994–1997; intermediate: 1998–June/2001; late: July/2001–2004). Observed and predicted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue rates were compared within each period by the z-test. The following regression models were developed: Predicted morbidity: ln R/1–R=–2.1+0.035xage–0.02xFVC+0.6xextended resection+0.7xcardiac co-morbidity (c-index=0.68). Predicted mortality: ln R/1–R=–7.6+0.08xage–0.04xppoFEV1+1.6xextended resection+1.2xcardiac co-morbidity+1.1xcerebrovascular co-morbidity (c-index=0.83). Predicted failure-to-rescue: ln R/1–R=–6.7+0.06xage+1.5xextended resection+1.2xcerebrovascular co-morbidity (c-index=0.71). No differences were noted between observed and predicted outcome rates within each period, despite apparent unadjusted differences between periods. The use of risk-adjusted outcome models prevented misleading information derived from the unadjusted analysis of performance. We are currently using these models for internal quality-of-care audit purposes.

Key Words: Lung cancer surgery; Outcomes; Morbidity; Mortality; Risk modelling; Quality of care

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Brunelli, M. Refai, F. Xiume, M. Salati, V. Sciarra, L. Socci, and A. Sabbatini Performance at Symptom-Limited Stair-Climbing Test is Associated With Increased Cardiopulmonary Complications, Mortality, and Costs After Major Lung Resection. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 240 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Brunelli, M. Refai, F. Xiume, M. Salati, R. Marasco, V. Sciarra, L. Socci, and A. Sabbatini Oxygen desaturation during maximal stair-climbing test and postoperative complications after major lung resections Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2008; 33(1): 77 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Brunelli, M. Salati, M. Refai, F. Xiume, G. Rocco, and A. Sabbatini Risk-adjusted econometric model to estimate postoperative costs: An additional instrument for monitoring performance after major lung resection J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2007; 134(3): 624 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Brunelli, N. J. Morgan-Hughes, M. Refai, M. Salati, A. Sabbatini, and G. Rocco Risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality models to compare the performance of two units after major lung resections J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2007; 133(1): 88 - 96. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]