This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Daniele Maselli Francesco Musumeci Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maselli, D. Articles by Musumeci, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maselli, D. Articles by Musumeci, F. Related Collections Cerebral protection Extracorporeal circulation Valve disease

Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli

^a Cardio-Thoracic Department, U.O. Cardiochirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Via Paradisa no 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
^b Department of Cardiac Surgery, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 050 995261; fax: +39 050 995271.

E-mail address: dmaselli{at}tiscali.it (D. Maselli).

To evaluate micro embolic events occurrence during minimally invasive mitral valve procedures, comparing balloon endovascular aortic occlusion (Group I) and transthoracic aortic clamping technique (Group II), 36 patients (20 in Group I and 16 in Group II) undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery were selected by CT scan and Doppler studies for absence of atherosclerotic disease at aortic, coronary or peripheral level. Assignment to one of the two groups was made on the basis of surgeon's preference. Continuous automated intra-operative transcranial Doppler was used to monitor micro embolic events during five operative steps: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) setup, time interval from CPB start until aortic clamp positioning, first minute after clamp-on, first minute after clamp-off, first ten minutes after CPB weaning start. More embolic events were observed in Group II than in Group I (total 143.4±30.6 per patient vs. 78.9±28.6 per patient). A large amount of embolic events occurring mainly when the aortic clamp was positioned and released accounted for the observed differences. In a low risk population for embolic events occurrence, endovascular balloon aortic clamping determined less embolic signals than transthoracic aortic clamping.

Key Words: Minimally invasive surgery; Embolism