ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:71-74. doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.117911
© 2006 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Olivier Jegaden
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farhat, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jegaden, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farhat, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jegaden, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Minimally invasive surgery

Institutional report - Coronary

Which place for Port AccessTM surgery in coronary artery bypass grafting? A mid-term follow up study

Fadi Farhata,*, Mathieu Vergnata, Pascale Blancb, Pascal Chiarib and Olivier Jegadena

a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery (Pr Jegaden), Hôpital Pradel, Université Claude Bernard, INSERM E0226, 28, avenue du doyen Lepine, 69677 Bron Cedex, France
b Department of Anaesthesia (Pr Lehot), Hôpital Pradel, Bron, France

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +33-(0)4-72-35-75-29; fax: +33-(0)4-72-35-75-32.

E-mail address: fadi.farhat{at}chu-lyon.fr (F. Farhat).

Between May 1997 and November 2002, 68 patients with one or two-vessel disease (55±9 years) underwent Port AccessTM CABG using the Heartport® endoCPB. The LITA was used in 63 cases, the RITA in 14, a radial artery in 2 and a vein graft in 3. Mean distal anastomoses was 1.3±0.5. Cross clamping, CPB, and operative times were 42±20 min, 64±27 min, and 3.8±1.5 h. Postoperative ventilation was 11±17 h, and ICU stay was 1.9±2.6 days. At day-1, troponin level was 2.3±2.9 UI and blood loss was 398±240 ml. Two patients needed long intubation and two had pleural re-drainage. One patient had a stroke, one had a myocardial infarction, and one underwent revision for bleeding. Hospital stay was 7±3 days. 65% were discharged to home. Follow up was completed in all cases (4.1±1.8 years). CCS score was significantly reduced (from 3.1±0.3 to 1.1±0.3, P<0.0001). Two patients had PTCA and stenting of non-grafted arteries. Five other patients had recurrent angina. Angiograms showed patent grafts in all cases. Two patients died after 19 months and 5 years from non cardiac reasons. In conclusion, Port AccessTM CABG remains a safe technique with stable results at mid-term follow up.

Key Words: Port AccessTM; Coronary; Follow up







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery