ICVTS Click here for other ICVTS advertising opportunities
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2006;5:36-41. doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.123455
© 2006 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Sanjay Asopa
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Education

Best evidence topic - Cardiac general

Does radial artery harvest with a harmonic scalpel result in fewer complications than standard electrocautery methods?

Anish Patela, Sanjay Asopaa and Joel Dunningb,*

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton, UK
b Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44-780-1548122.

E-mail address: joeldunning{at}doctors.org.uk (J. Dunning).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether radial arterial harvest with a harmonic scalpel produced a lower incidence of complications or was superior to conventional harvest with the diathermy or scissors and clip techniques. Two hundred and forty-seven papers were found using the reported search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses were tabulated. We identified 10 studies, 2/5 studies report faster harvesting with the harmonic scalpel, 6 studies report reduced requirement for surgical clips, 2 papers report less spasm, 2/4 studies reported less numbness, and 2 studies reported no electron microscopic differences. Three studies looked at angiography or flow, with one equivocal, one in favour of harmonic and one in favour of scissors and clips. We conclude that there is little convincing evidence in the literature to guide the decision to use a harmonic scalpel over electrocautery for radial artery harvest.

Key Words: Thoracic surgery; Harmonic scalpel; Radial artery; Coronary arterial bypass graft




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. S. Brazio, P. C. Laird, C. Xu, J. Gu, N. S. Burris, E. N. Brown, Z. N. Kon, and R. S. Poston
Harmonic scalpel versus electrocautery for harvest of radial artery conduits: Reduced risk of spasm and intimal injury on optical coherence tomography.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1302 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2006 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery