ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:478-483. doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.115410
© 2005 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Education

Best evidence topic - Vascular

Is sympathectomy of benefit in critical leg ischaemia not amenable to revascularisation?

Aliu Sanni*, Arief Hamid and Joel Dunning

Department of Vascular Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle, NE7 7DN, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +44 793 9198523.

E-mail address: aliuoladipupo{at}yahoo.com (A. Sanni).

A best evidence topic in vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the use of sympathectomy was of benefit in non-revascularisable critical leg ischaemia. Altogether 387 papers were found using the reported search, of which 13 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses were tabulated. We conclude that lumbar sympathectomy is a minimally invasive procedure with a low complication rate. Randomized controlled trials have failed to identify any objective benefits for lumbar sympathectomy, but subjective improvements in symptoms for patients with highly symptomatic critical leg ischaemia have been consistently demonstrated in multiple cohort studies with sustained symptom improvements in approximately 60% of patients. Lumbar sympathectomy should be considered for symptomatic patients with critical leg ischaemia as an alternative to amputation in patients with otherwise viable limbs.

Key Words: Evidence-based medicine; Sympathectomy; Critical leg ischaemia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery