ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2005;4:304-310. doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.107490
© 2005 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Georgios P. Georghiou
Bernardo A. Vidne
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Georghiou, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Georghiou, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Coronary disease

Best evidence topic - Cardiac general

Does the radial artery provide better long-term patency than the saphenous vein?

Georgios P. Georghioua,b,*, Bernardo A. Vidnea,b and Joel Dunningc

a Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva 49 100, Israel
b Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
c Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

*Corresponding author. Tel.: +972-3-937-6701; fax: +972-3-924-0762.

E-mail address: georgios{at}clalit.org.il (G.P. Georghiou).

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the radial artery provides better long-term patency than the saphenous vein. Altogether 379 papers were found using the reported search, of which 12 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We concluded that there is evidence that radial artery grafts have a higher rate of patency than saphenous vein grafts. Surgeons can confidently use the radial artery as a second arterial bypass graft, particularly in patients with severe native-vessel stenosis.

Key Words: Evidence-based medicine; Radial artery; Thoracic surgery; Review




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MMCTSHome page
B. F. Buxton, S. Seevanayagam, and R. Kaiche
Use of radial artery for coronary revascularization
MMCTS, February 19, 2007; 2007(0219): 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. J. Gardner
Searching for the Second-Best Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: Is It the Radial Artery?
Circulation, February 13, 2007; 115(6): 678 - 680.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery