This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barnard, J. Articles by Speake, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barnard, J. Articles by Speake, D. Related Collections Cardiac - physiology Cerebral protection Valve disease

In open heart surgery is there a role for the use of carbon dioxide field flooding techniques to reduce the level of post-operative gaseous emboli?

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK

^* Corresponding author. Fax: +44-161-2764851. (E-mail: dougspeake{at}hotmail.com).

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether there is any benefit to the use of carbon dioxide (CO₂) field flooding techniques in open heart surgery in order to reduce post-operative gaseous emboli. Altogether 103 papers were found using the reported search, of which 3 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that there is no large clinical study to prove that there is a neurocognitive benefit to the use of CO₂ field flooding. However, experimental evidence shows that the solubility of CO₂ emboli justifies efforts to replace intracavital air with CO₂ in open heart surgery to reduce gaseous emboli but that caution is warranted as use of excessive cardiotomy suction may result in hypercarbia.