ICVTS Click here to goto Smart Canula website
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joel Dunning
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Espinet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Espinet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dunning, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Anesthesia
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrow Education
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 3:523-527(2004)
© 2004 European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery


Best evidence topic - Cardiac general

Does ultrasound-guided central line insertion reduce complications and time to placement in elective patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Anthony Espinet* and Joel Dunning*

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK

* Corresponding authors. Tel./fax: +44-780-154-8122
anthony.espinet{at}nuth.northy.nhs.uk

joeldunning{at}doctors.org.uk

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether ultrasound probe central line placement reduced complications and time to placement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Altogether, 193 papers were found from Medline using the reported search of which 6 papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses and comments were tabulated. We conclude that in patients with a potentially difficult central line insertion, the ultrasound technique reduces complications and time to insertion. However, in those patients where no difficulty is predicted, there is no evidence that the ultrasound technique confers any advantage.

Key Words: Evidence-based medicine; Central venous catheterisation; Review; Cardiac surgery; Ultrasonography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Verma, S. Mohan, and S. S. Baijal
Central Venous Catheter in the Sigmoid Sinus
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 1002 - 1003.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 2004 European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery